Cited by 264Evolution and Paleontology StudiesGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetic diversity and population structure

Phylogeny of eagles, Old World vultures, and other Accipitridae based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA

Lerner, Heather R.L., Mindell, David P.·2005·Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Abstract

We assessed phylogenetic relationships for birds of prey in the family Accipitridae using molecular sequence from two mitochondrial genes (1047 bases ND2 and 1041 bases cyt-b) and one nuclear intron (1074 bases beta-fibrinogen intron 7). We sampled representatives of all 14 Accipitridae subfamilies, focusing on four subfamilies of eagles (booted eagles, sea eagles, harpy eagles, and snake eagles) and two subfamilies of Old World vultures (Gypaetinae and Aegypiinae) with nearly all known species represented. Multiple well-supported relationships among accipitrids identified with DNA differ from those traditionally recognized based on morphology or life history traits. Monophyly of sea eagles (Haliaeetinae) and booted eagles (Aquilinae) was supported; however, harpy eagles (Harpiinae), snake eagles (Circaetinae), and Old World vultures were found to be non-monophyletic. The Gymnogene (Polyboroides typus) and the Crane Hawk (Geranospiza caerulescens) were not found to be close relatives, presenting an example of convergent evolution for specialized limb morphology enabling predation on cavity nesting species. Investigation of named subspecies within Hieraaetus fasciatus and H. morphnoides revealed significant genetic differentiation or non-monophyly supporting recognition of H. spilogaster and H. weiskei as distinctive species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.04.010

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lerner, H. R. L., & Mindell, D. P.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Lerner, Heather R.L.
Venue
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
327-346
ISSN
1055-7903 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144677680
Cited by
264
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
Accipitridae, eagle, Old World vultures, phylogenetic relationships, ND2, cytochrome b, sea eagle, harpy eagle, convergent evolution, Hieraaetus fasciatus, species delimitation, monophyly
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Nucleolus, DNA, Mitochondrial, Fibrinogen, Genes, Introns, NADH Dehydrogenase, Phylogeny, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Eagles, Cytochromes b, Falconiformes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review