The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pattern and timing of diversification of the mammalian order Carnivora inferred from multiple nuclear gene sequences
Open accessAbstract
The mammalian order Carnivora has attracted the attention of scientists of various disciplines for decades, leading to intense interest in defining its supra-familial relationships. In the last few years, major changes to the topological structure of the carnivoran tree have been proposed and supported by various molecular data sets, radically changing the traditional view of family composition in this order. Although a sequence of molecular studies have established a growing consensus with respect to most inter-familial relationships, no analysis so far has included all carnivoran lineages (both feliform and caniform) in an integrated data set, so as to determine comparative patterns of diversification. Moreover, no study conducted thus far has estimated divergence dates times among all carnivoran families, which is an important requirement in the attempt to understand the patterns and tempo of diversification in this group. In this study, we have investigated the phylogenetic relationships among carnivoran families, and performed molecular dating analyses of the inferred nodes. We assembled a molecular supermatrix containing 14 genes (7,765 bp), most of which have not been previously used in supra-familial carnivoran phylogenetics, for 50 different genera representing all carnivoran families. Analysis of this data set led to consistent and robust resolution of all supra-familial nodes in the carnivoran tree, and allowed the construction of a molecular timescale for the evolution of this mammalian order.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · Cited by 21,937
Multiple Comparisons of Log-Likelihoods with Applications to Phylogenetic Inference
Shimodaira, H., & Hasegawa, M. (1999) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026201 · Cited by 4,237
Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog
members, B. S. P., Lindblad-Toh, K., Wade, C. M., Mikkelsen, T. S., Karlsson, E. K., Jaffe, D. B., Kamal, M., Clamp, M., Chang, J. L., Kulbokas, E. J., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04338 · Cited by 2,568
Self-citationGenome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies.
Rokas, A., Williams, B. L., King, N., & Carroll, S. B. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02053 · Cited by 1,512
Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution
Thorne, J. L., Kishino, H., & Painter, I. S. (1998) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025892 · Cited by 1,317 · cited 22×
“Considering the results from these two studies , more congruence with respect to Pinnipedia is ob - served with our Divtime analysis than with BEAST , suggesting that the latter may have underestimated the age of this node ( see Table 6 ) .”
MethodInfluentialPerformance of a divergence time estimation method under a probabilistic model of rate evolution.
Kishino, H., Thorne, J. L., & Bruno, W. J. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003811 · Cited by 633 · cited 22×
“Considering the results from these two studies , more congruence with respect to Pinnipedia is ob - served with our Divtime analysis than with BEAST , suggesting that the latter may have underestimated the age of this node ( see Table 6 ) .”
MethodInfluential
Cited by
dos Reis, M., Inoue, J., Hasegawa, M., Asher, R. J., Donoghue, P. C. J., & Yang, Z. (2012) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.0683 · Cited by 526
Slater, G. J., Harmon, L. J., & Alfaro, M. E. (2012) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01723.x · Cited by 334
Convergence of gut microbiomes in myrmecophagous mammals
Delsuc, F., Metcalf, J. L., Wegener Parfrey, L., Song, S. J., González, A., & Knight, R. (2014) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12501 · Cited by 347
Phylogenetic systematics of the genus Echinococcus (Cestoda: Taeniidae)
Nakao, M., Lavikainen, A., Yanagida, T., & Ito, A. (2013) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.002 · Cited by 301
Evolution of Mammalian Diving Capacity Traced by Myoglobin Net Surface Charge
Mirceta, S., Signore, A. V., Burns, J. M., Cossins, A. R., Campbell, K. L., & Berenbrink, M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1234192 · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Eizirik, E., Murphy, W. J., Koepfli, K.-P., Johnson, W. E., Dragoo, J. W., Wayne, R. K., & O’Brien, S. J.
- Venue
- Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-63
- ISSN
- 1055-7903 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126333522
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 13.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pattern and timing of diversification of the mammalian order Carnivora inferred from multiple nuclear gene sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.01.033
- The paper
- Eizirik, E., Murphy, W. J., Koepfli, K.-P., Johnson, W. E., Dragoo, J. W., Wayne, R. K., & O’Brien, S. J. (2010). Pattern and timing of diversification of the mammalian order Carnivora inferred from multiple nuclear gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.01.033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.