The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent progress of chatter prediction, detection and suppression in milling
Abstract
Abstract Machining chatter has been studied by scholars over the past decades, since chatter has a significant impact on surface quality and productivity. Researchers have carried out extensive research on offline chatter prediction, online chatter detection, and chatter suppression. However, these studies have not been comprehensively reviewed. Especially with the development of intelligent manufacturing (IM), some new requirements for research on chatter have already been put forward. Hence, it is crucial to conduct a systematic review of chatter, focusing on regenerative chatter and mode coupling chatter. This paper presents a critical review from the three areas and a detailed summary of each section can be found at the end of this section. Furthermore, the current research issues in three areas and overall are proposed. In response to these problems, four directions for future research are presented: (1) integrating the chatter prediction, detection and suppression units into a smart machine tool or smart spindle; (2) high speed and real-time wireless transmission with high sample rate; (3) advanced real-time data processing and decision-making methods; (4) integrated chatter monitoring system involving the thin-walled parts with the complex surface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural networks for pattern recognition
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-5500 · Cited by 18,538
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
Variational Mode Decomposition
Dragomiretskiy, K., & Zosso, D. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2013.2288675 · Cited by 9,184
A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance
Jardine, A. K. S., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012 · Cited by 4,816
Modal Testing: Theory and Practice
Ewins, D. J., & Saunders, H. (1986) · Journal of Vibration and Acoustics · doi:10.1115/1.3269294 · Cited by 2,507
Gilles, J. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2013.2265222 · Cited by 2,210
Analytical Prediction of Stability Lobes in Milling
Altıntaş, Y., & Budak, E. (1995) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/s0007-8506(07)62342-7 · Cited by 1,914
Manufacturing Automation: Metal Cutting Mechanics, Machine Tool Vibrations, and CNC Design
Altintas, & Ber (2001) · Applied Mechanics Reviews · doi:10.1115/1.1399383 · Cited by 1,768
Advanced monitoring of machining operations
Teti, R., Jemielniak, K., O’Donnell, G., & Dornfeld, D. (2010) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.010 · Cited by 1,354
Chatter in machining processes: A review
Quintana, G., & Ciurana, J. (2011) · International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture · doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.01.001 · Cited by 1,038
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, L., & Liu, C.
- Venue
- Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 143
- Pages
- 106840
- ISSN
- 0888-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3014857520
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 22.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent progress of chatter prediction, detection and suppression in milling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106840
- The paper
- Zhu, L., & Liu, C. (2020). Recent progress of chatter prediction, detection and suppression in milling. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106840
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.