The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Signal based condition monitoring techniques for fault detection and diagnosis of induction motors: A state-of-the-art review
Abstract
Abstract Uninterrupted and trouble-free operation of induction motors (IMs) is the compulsion of the modern industries. Firstly, the paper reviews the conventional time and spectrum signal analyses of two most effective type of signals, i.e. the vibration and the current for various IM faults. The vibration and the current signal analyses (time and spectral) is performed using the signals measured from different faulty IMs from a laboratory setup. Subsequently, the advantages and difficulties associated with these conventional procedures are discussed. Next, this paper presents and summarizes the existing research and development in the field of signal based automation of condition monitoring methodologies for the fault detection and diagnosis of various electrical and mechanical faults of IMs. Nowadays, artificial intelligent (AI) methods are being employed for the IM and other machine fault diagnosis. Advancements of the AI based fault diagnosis including the popular approaches are reviewed in details. These techniques are being integrated with traditional monitoring techniques. The AI based fault monitoring and detection techniques for IMs published up to 2000 are briefly described, however, more attention is paid to the techniques that are introduced in roughly past two decades, i.e. during 2000–2019. In overall, this paper includes review of system signals, conventional and advance signal processing techniques; however, it mainly covers, the selection of effective statistical features, AI methods, and associated training and testing strategies for fault diagnostics of IMs. Finally, dedicated discussions on the recent developments, research gaps and future scopes in the fault monitoring and diagnosis of IMs are added.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction
Lei, Y., Li, N., Guo, L., Li, N., Yan, T., & Lin, J. (2018) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.016 · Cited by 2,634
A new convolutional neural network-based data-driven fault diagnosis method
Wen, L., Li, X., Gao, L., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2017.2774777 · Cited by 2,222
Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis
Widodo, A., & Yang, B.-S. (2007) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.12.007 · Cited by 1,650
Gangsar, P., & Tiwari, R. (2014) · Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention · doi:10.1007/s11668-014-9893-4 · Cited by 25
Self-citation
Cited by
Motor Fault Diagnostics Based on Current Signatures: A Review
Niu, G., Dong, X., & Chen, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3285999 · Cited by 269
Wang, X., Lu, S., Huang, W., Wang, Q., Zhang, S., & Xia, M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2021.3051668 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Gangsar, P., & Tiwari, R.
- Venue
- Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 144
- Pages
- 106908
- ISSN
- 0888-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3018957240
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 35.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Signal based condition monitoring techniques for fault detection and diagnosis of induction motors: A state-of-the-art review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106908
- The paper
- Gangsar, P., & Tiwari, R. (2020). Signal based condition monitoring techniques for fault detection and diagnosis of induction motors: A state-of-the-art review. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106908
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.