Cited by 16Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesFault Detection and Control SystemsMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques

Statistical subspace-based damage detection with estimated reference

Open access
Viefhues, Eva, Döhler, Michael, Hille, Falk, Mevel, Laurent·2022·Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108241

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Viefhues, E., Döhler, M., Hille, F., & Mevel, L.
Affiliations
  • Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
  • Federal Institute For Materials Research and Testing (DE)
Corresponding author
Viefhues, Eva
Venue
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
164
Pages
108241
ISSN
0888-3270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3186061672
Cited by
16
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Keywords
vibration-based structural health monitoring, residual function, Hankel matrices, hypothesis testing, residual covariance, estimation uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review