Cited by 164Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesControl Systems and IdentificationStatistical and numerical algorithms

Efficient multi-order uncertainty computation for stochastic subspace identification

Open access
Döhler, Michael, Mevel, Laurent·2013·Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.01.012

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Döhler, M., & Mevel, L.
Affiliations
Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
Corresponding author
Döhler, Michael
Venue
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
346-366
ISSN
0888-3270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995899078
Cited by
163
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
Keywords
stochastic subspace identification, uncertainty bounds, modal parameters, stabilization diagram, model reduction, computational efficiency, modal analysis, structural dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review