Cited by 11Virus-based gene therapy researchRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 52 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Ex vivo modification of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells for gene therapy

Open access

Abstract

The development of viral vectors has been particularly critical for genetic therapies of hematological diseases. Before the development of retrovirus vectors (RVVs), gene transfer into mammalian cells was accomplished by transduction of DNA plasmids by chemical means and later by electroporation. The main limitation of these methods is the inefficiency of transfer of intact sequences, and particularly with electroporation significant cell death of the manipulated cells. The earliest successful human gene therapy trials utilized γ-RVVs and many of the techniques developed in the 1980s. A breakthrough for the field was the exploitation and development of HIV for transfer vectors, termed lentivirus vectors. In this review, we highlight uses of retro- and lentivirus vectors in monogenic diseases in which hematopoietic stem cells are used in the autologous setting to treat immunodeficiencies, hemoglobinopathies and metabolic diseases. The three authors' perspective represent experiences in the field over four decades that encompasses both basic translational research and development and oversight of early and ongoing gene therapy trials utilizing viral vectors.

Overview

CoChat Summary

Written by AI from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review summarizes four decades of ex vivo hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) gene therapy using γ-retroviral and lentiviral vectors for immunodeficiencies, hemoglobinopathies, and metabolic/lysosomal diseases. It highlights curative clinical results, the shift to lentiviral vectors, and persistent risks including insertional oncogenesis, manufacturing complexity, and limited access.

Key findings

  • Lentiviral vectors (LVVs) have become the predominant HSPC gene-transfer platform, with hundreds of patients treated safely and three LVV products recently FDA-approved for HSC gene therapies; γ-retroviral vectors remain useful but carry enhancer-driven insertional oncogenesis risk.
  • In ADA-SCID, γ-retroviral HSC gene therapy treated more than 60 patients, with one vector-related T cell leukemia; a SIN LVV ADA-SCID therapy reported 50 treated patients with 100% survival, 96% event-free survival, 2 engraftment failures, and no insertional events out to 6–11 years.
  • In XSCID, 20 patients treated with γ-retroviral vectors had high immune restoration but a significant number developed T leukoproliferative complications; subsequent SIN γ-retroviral and SIN LVV approaches treated 9 and more than 30 patients, respectively, with immune reconstitution and no clonal expansion.
  • For metabolic and hemoglobin disorders, cALD gene therapy in 32 patients showed benefit at median 6-year follow-up but was complicated by insertional mutagenesis and hematological malignancy; MLD therapy in 29 pediatric patients had 26 alive at median 3.16 years (range 0.64–7.51), and MPS I therapy in 8 patients showed metabolic correction at median 2.1 years.

Methods

  • Narrative review by three authors with four decades of experience in basic, translational, and clinical HSPC gene therapy.
  • Evidence drawn from preclinical animal models, early and ongoing human gene therapy trials, long-term follow-up studies, and approved products for immunodeficiencies, leukodystrophies, mucopolysaccharidoses, and hemoglobinopathies.
  • No systematic search strategy, meta-analysis, or new primary data collection is described.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: high financial costs and commercialization challenges limit gene therapy for rare and ultra-rare diseases; manufacturing of LVVs remains complex and can cause pipeline delays; cytotoxic conditioning is still needed for high-level engraftment; access to approved therapies remains limited; follow-up for gene-editing approaches is short and few patients have been treated.
  • Evident from the text: this is a narrative review rather than a systematic review, so selection and emphasis may reflect the authors’ perspectives and experience.
  • Evident from the text: the authors report multiple financial and advisory conflicts of interest, including founderships, equity, consulting, and vector licensing relationships with gene therapy companies.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.03.058

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 Development of HSC gene therapy
Figure 1 Development of HSC gene therapyCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

28 Own interpretation · 18 Check pending · 10 No full text of the sources · 10 Not checked yet · 7 No basis given · 2 Sources not found · 1 Own result

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 13
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 38
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1

Create a free account to see these claims.

Create a free account to see these assumptions.

26 more claims

Create a free account to see all 76 claims and to verify the 33 references still open.

See all claims — free account

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 90 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pai, 2023, Universal survival and superior immune reconstitution after lentiviral gene therapy with low dose conditioning for X-linked SCID (SCID-X1), Mol. Ther., 31, 1

Cited by

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Williams, D. A., Kohn, D. B., & Thrasher, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Williams, David A.
Venue
Molecular Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
2141-2153
ISSN
1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409101084
Cited by
11
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Keywords
hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, gene therapy, retroviral vectors, lentiviral vectors, HIV-based vectors, autologous transplantation, immunodeficiency, hemoglobinopathies, metabolic disorders, monogenic disorders, viral vectors, gene transfer efficiency
MeSH terms
Animals, Clinical Trials as Topic, Genetic Vectors, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Humans, Retroviridae, Genetic Therapy, Lentivirus, Gene Transfer Techniques, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-12, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-12 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review