Cited by 138Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningWomen's cancer prevention and managementDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging

The contribution of emotional characteristics to breast cancer screening among women from six ethnic groups

Consedine, N·2004·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background This study was designed to determine which of several emotional propensities were associated with the frequency of mammograms and clinical breast exams among six groups of minority women. Three emotion-related variables that have been identified in the previous literature as influencing screening were examined: Repression, cancer worry, and embarrassment. However, these variables have never been examined within the same study, nor where relevant background variables are controlled.Methods 1364 African American, US-born white, English-speaking Caribbean, Haitian, Dominican, and Eastern European women were recruited via stratified-cluster sampling. Participants provided demographics and measures of beliefs and knowledge.Results As expected, self-regulation and cancer worry were both positively associated with mammogram and clinical breast exam frequency, while embarrassment regarding having a mammogram was negatively associated with screening. These results held even after controlling for demographic variables and the presence or absence of physician recommendation. Screening rates for African American women equaled or exceeded the rates for European Americans. Other minority subpopulations had even lower screening rates, including women from the English-speaking Caribbean and Haitians.Conclusions Results are discussed in terms of their implications for screening intervention, models of health behavior, and the need for more precise operationalizations of ethnicity in screening research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.030

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some literature suggests that African American women are socialized in ways that encourage emotional restriction or repression and discourage emotional expression.

    “Some literature suggests that African American women are socialized in ways that encourage emotional restriction or repression and discourage emotional expression (Consedine et al., 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Consedine, N.
Affiliations
Long Island University (US)
Corresponding author
Consedine, N
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
64-77
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056411993
Cited by
138
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k07ag000921-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (K07 AG00921)
  • National Cancer Institute (P20CA091372)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (S06GM054650, 2SO6 GM54650)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Keywords
breast cancer screening, mammography, clinical breast examination, emotional characteristics, repression, fear of cancer, embarrassment, self-regulation, minority women, African American women, Caribbean women, Haitian women, Dominican women, Eastern European women, ethnic differences, health behavior models, physician recommendations
MeSH terms
Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Emotions, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, New York City

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review