CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 443Nutritional Studies and DietFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proximity of supermarkets is positively associated with diet quality index for pregnancy

LARAIA, B·2004·Preventive Medicine
DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.018
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the association between distance to the closest supermarket and a composite measure of diet, the diet quality index for pregnancy (DQI-P) was constructed.Methods Data from the Pregnancy, Infection and Nutrition (PIN) cohort, a prospective study of determinants of preterm birth, were analyzed. Food frequency questionnaires were used to construct DQI-P which includes: servings of grains, vegetables, fruits, folate, iron and calcium intake, percentage of calories from fat, and meal pattern score. Street address of residence, supermarkets, grocery and convenience stores were geocoded. Participants with complete food frequency and address data were included (n = 918). Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate the conditional association of food outlets on diet quality, controlling for confounders and using a robust variance estimator to account for clustering of neighborhood characteristics.Results Women living greater than 4 miles from a supermarket were more than twice the odds (adjusted odds ratio = 2.16; 95% confidence interval = 1.2, 4.0) of falling into the lowest compared to highest DQI-P tertile compared to women living within 2 miles of a supermarket, after controlling for individual characteristics, other food retail outlets.Conclusion These findings suggest that proximity of food retail outlets influences the diet quality of pregnant women.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.018

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 443

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
LARAIA, B.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
LARAIA, B
ORCID
LARAIA, B
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
869-875
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.018
OpenAlex
W2074961137
Cited by
441
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 32
FWCI
12.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
food retail outlets, diet quality, pregnancy, food environment, pregnant women, preterm birth, neighborhood food access, meal patterns, fruit and vegetable intake, folate intake
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Diet, Diet Surveys, Female, Humans, North Carolina, Pregnancy, Cohort Studies, Odds Ratio, Food Industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review