Socioeconomic inequalities in food purchasing: The contribution of respondent-perceived and actual (objectively measured) price and availability of foods
Abstract
Background Research has shown that lower socioeconomic groups purchase foods that are less consistent with dietary recommendations. The price and availability of foods are thought to be important mediating factors between socioeconomic position and food purchasing.Objectives We examined the relative contribution of the perceived and objectively measured price and availability of recommended foods to household income differences in food purchasing.Methods Using a face-to-face interview, a random sample of Brisbane residents (n=812) were asked about their food purchasing choices in 2000. They were also asked about their perceptions of the price and availability of 'recommended' foods (i.e. choices lower in fat, saturated fat, sugar, salt or higher in fibre) in the supermarkets where they usually shopped. Audits measuring the actual availability and price of identical foods were conducted in the same supermarkets.Results Lower socioeconomic groups were less likely to make food purchasing choices consistent with dietary guideline recommendations. Objective availability and price differences were not associated with purchasing choices, nor did they contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in food purchasing choices. Perceived availability and price differences were associated with the purchase of recommended foods. Perceived availability made a small contribution to inequalities in food purchasing, however perceived price differences did not.Conclusion Socioeconomic inequalities in food purchasing are not mediated by differential availability of recommended foods and differences in price between recommended and regular foods in supermarkets, or by perceptions of their relative price. However, differential perceptions of the availability of recommended foods may play a small role in food purchasing inequalities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a study among adults of lower socioeconomic status, perceptions of lower availability and higher price of healthier foods, rather than actual availability or price, were associated with fewer healthful food purchases.
“In a study among adults of lower socioeconomic status, perceptions of lower availability and higher price of healthier foods, rather than actual availability or price, were associated with fewer healthful food purchases.161”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [161]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 190
- Authors
- Giskes, K., Van Lenthe, F. J., Brug, J., Mackenbach, J. P., & Turrell, G.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Venue
- Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-48
- ISSN
- 0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060719219
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 20.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Keywords
- socioeconomic disparities, food purchasing, dietary guidelines, household income, consumer perception
- MeSH terms
- Consumer Behavior, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Food, Food Supply, Humans, Income, Interviews as Topic, Perception, Queensland, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Linear Models, Nutrition Policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review