Cited by 190Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Socioeconomic inequalities in food purchasing: The contribution of respondent-perceived and actual (objectively measured) price and availability of foods

Giskes, K., Van Lenthe, F.J., Brug, J., Mackenbach, J.P., Turrell, G.·2007·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Research has shown that lower socioeconomic groups purchase foods that are less consistent with dietary recommendations. The price and availability of foods are thought to be important mediating factors between socioeconomic position and food purchasing.Objectives We examined the relative contribution of the perceived and objectively measured price and availability of recommended foods to household income differences in food purchasing.Methods Using a face-to-face interview, a random sample of Brisbane residents (n=812) were asked about their food purchasing choices in 2000. They were also asked about their perceptions of the price and availability of 'recommended' foods (i.e. choices lower in fat, saturated fat, sugar, salt or higher in fibre) in the supermarkets where they usually shopped. Audits measuring the actual availability and price of identical foods were conducted in the same supermarkets.Results Lower socioeconomic groups were less likely to make food purchasing choices consistent with dietary guideline recommendations. Objective availability and price differences were not associated with purchasing choices, nor did they contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in food purchasing choices. Perceived availability and price differences were associated with the purchase of recommended foods. Perceived availability made a small contribution to inequalities in food purchasing, however perceived price differences did not.Conclusion Socioeconomic inequalities in food purchasing are not mediated by differential availability of recommended foods and differences in price between recommended and regular foods in supermarkets, or by perceptions of their relative price. However, differential perceptions of the availability of recommended foods may play a small role in food purchasing inequalities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.04.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 190

Authors
Giskes, K., Van Lenthe, F. J., Brug, J., Mackenbach, J. P., & Turrell, G.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
41-48
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060719219
Cited by
190
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 23
FWCI
20.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
socioeconomic disparities, food purchasing, dietary guidelines, household income, consumer perception
MeSH terms
Consumer Behavior, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Food, Food Supply, Humans, Income, Interviews as Topic, Perception, Queensland, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Linear Models, Nutrition Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review