Cited by 111Child Abuse and TraumaMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsResilience and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adverse childhood experiences, dispositional mindfulness, and adult health

Abstract

Objective To determine whether greater dispositional mindfulness is associated with better adult health across a range of exposures to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs).Methods In 2012, a web-based survey of 2160 Pennsylvania Head Start staff was conducted. We assessed ACE score (count of eight categories of childhood adversity), dispositional mindfulness (Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised), and the prevalence of three outcomes: multiple health conditions (≥ 3 of 7 conditions), poor health behavior (≥ 2 of 5 behaviors), and poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (≥ 2 of 5 indicators).Results Respondents were 97% females, and 23% reported ≥ 3 ACEs. The prevalences of multiple health conditions, poor health behavior, and poor HRQOL were 29%, 21%, and 13%, respectively. At each level of ACE exposure, health outcomes were better in those with greater mindfulness. For example, among persons reporting ≥ 3 ACEs, those in the highest quartile of mindfulness had a prevalence of multiple health conditions two-thirds that of those in the lowest quartile (adjusted prevalence ratio (95% confidence interval)=0.66 (0.51, 0.86)); for those reporting no ACEs, the ratio was 0.62 (0.41, 0.94).Conclusion Across a range of exposures to ACEs, greater dispositional mindfulness was associated with fewer health conditions, better health behavior, and better HRQOL.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.029

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 111

Metadata

Authors
Whitaker, R. C., Dearth-Wesley, T., Gooze, R. A., Becker, B. D., Gallagher, K. C., & McEwen, B. S.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • Child Trends (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Rockefeller University (US)
Corresponding author
Whitaker, Robert C.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
67
Pages
147-153
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013841132
Cited by
110
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Temple University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
adverse childhood experiences, trait mindfulness, adult health, health-related quality of life, health behavior, childhood adversity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Chronic Disease, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pennsylvania, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Health Behavior, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review