The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence-Based Surgical Care and the Evolution of Fast-Track Surgery
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Optimization of postoperative outcome requires the application of evidence-based principles of care carefully integrated into a multimodal rehabilitation program. OBJECTIVE: To assess, synthesize, and discuss implementation of "fast-track" recovery programs. DATA SOURCES: Medline MBASE (January 1966-May 2007) and the Cochrane library (January 1966-May 2007) were searched using the following keywords: fast-track, enhanced recovery, accelerated rehabilitation, and multimodal and perioperative care. In addition, the synthesis on the many specific interventions and organizational and implementation issues were based on data published within the past 5 years from major anesthesiological and surgical journals, using systematic reviews where appropriate instead of multiple references of original work. DATA SYNTHESIS: Based on an increasing amount of multinational, multicenter cohort studies, randomized studies, and meta-analyses, the concept of the "fast-track methodology" has uniformly provided a major enhancement in recovery leading to decreased hospital stay and with an apparent reduction in medical morbidity but unaltered "surgery-specific" morbidity in a variety of procedures. However, despite being based on a combination of evidence-based unimodal principles of care, recent surveys have demonstrated slow adaptation and implementation of the fast-track methodology. CONCLUSION: Multimodal evidence-based care within the fast-track methodology significantly enhances postoperative recovery and reduces morbidity, and should therefore be more widely adopted. Further improvement is expected by future integration of minimal invasive surgery, pharmacological stress-reduction, and effective multimodal, nonopioid analgesia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Endocrinology of the stress response
Charmandari, E., Tsigos, C., & Chrousos, G. (2005) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.67.040403.120816 · Cited by 1,799
Cited by
Adamina, M., Kehlet, H., Tomlinson, G. A., Senagore, A. J., & Delaney, C. P. (2011) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.11.003 · Cited by 555
Self-citationBehrns, K. E. (2012) · Yearbook of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ysur.2011.11.001 · Cited by 426
Osland, E., Yunus, R. M., Khan, S., & Memon, M. A. (2011) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · doi:10.1177/0148607110385698 · Cited by 298
Single dose oral analgesics for acute postoperative pain in adults - an overview of Cochrane reviews
Moore, R. A., Derry, S., Aldington, D., & Wiffen, P. J. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008659.pub3 · Cited by 258
Single dose oral analgesics for acute postoperative pain in adults
Moore, R. A., Derry, S., McQuay, H. J., & Wiffen, P. J. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008659.pub2 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Kehlet, H., & Wilmore, D. W.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 248
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-198
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063338708
- Cited by
- 1,819
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 63.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence-Based Surgical Care and the Evolution of Fast-Track Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e31817f2c1a
- The paper
- Kehlet, H., & Wilmore, D. W. (2008). Evidence-Based Surgical Care and the Evolution of Fast-Track Surgery. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31817f2c1a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.