Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bicycle helmet efficacy: a meta-analysis

Attewell, R.G., Glase, K., McFadden, M.·2001·Accident Analysis & Prevention

Abstract

Bicycle helmet efficacy was quantified using a formal meta-analytic approach based on peer-reviewed studies. Only those studies with individual injury and helmet use data were included. Based on studies from several countries published in the period 1987-1998, the summary odds ratio estimate for efficacy is 0.40 (95% confidence interval 0.29, 0.55) for head injury, 0.42 (0.26, 0.67) for brain injury, 0.53 (0.39, 0.73) for facial injury and 0.27 (0.10, 0.71) for fatal injury. This indicates a statistically significant protective effect of helmets. Three studies provided neck injury results that were unfavourable to helmets with a summary estimate of 1.36 (1.00, 1.86), but this result may not be applicable to the lighter helmets currently in use. In conclusion, the evidence is clear that bicycle helmets prevent serious injury and even death. Despite this, the use of helmets is sub-optimal. Helmet use for all riders should be further encouraged to the extent that it is uniformly accepted and analogous to the use of seat belts by motor vehicle occupants.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00048-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personal protective equipment (PPE) is rated as the lowest and least effective safety control for any high-risk activity including human-horse interactions.

    “While personal protective equipment (PPE) should be part of human–horse risk management, it is rated as the ‘lowest’ and ‘least’ effective safety control for any ‘high-risk’ activity including human–horse interactions [17,119,120,121].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. DerSimonian, 1986, Meta-analysis in clinical trials, Controlled Clinical Trials, 7, 177, 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Dorsch, 1987, Do bicycle safety helmets reduce severity of head injury in real crashes?, Accident Analysis Prevention, 19, 183, 10.1016/0001-4575(87)90002-9 · DOI
  3. Finvers, 1996, The effect of bicycling helmets in preventing significant bicycle-related injuries in children, Clinical Journal Sport Medicine, 6, 102, 10.1097/00042752-199604000-00007 · DOI
  4. Henderson, M. 1995. Bicycle helmet effectiveness: a review. Motor Accidents Authority of New South Wales, Australia.
  5. Jacobson, 1998, Bicycle injuries: road trauma is not the only concern, Australian New Zealand Journal Public Health, 22, 451, 10.1111/j.1467-842X.1998.tb01413.x · DOI
  6. Linn, 1998, Epidemiology of bicycle injury, head injury and helmet use among children in British Columbia: a five year descriptive study, Injury Prevention, 4, 122, 10.1136/ip.4.2.122 · DOI
  7. Maimaris, 1994, Injury patterns in cyclists attending an accident and emergency department: a comparison of helmet wearers and non-wearers, British Medical Journal, 308, 1537, 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1537 · DOI
  8. McDermott, 1993, The effectiveness of bicyclist helmets: a study of 1710 casualties, Journal Trauma, 34, 834, 10.1097/00005373-199306000-00015 · DOI
  9. Petitti, D.B. 1994. Meta-analysis, decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis: methods for quantitative synthesis in medicine. Oxford University Press, New York.
  10. Povey, 1999, Cycle helmet effectiveness in New Zealand, Accident Analysis Prevention, 31, 763, 10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00033-0 · DOI
  11. Rivara, 1998, Prevention of bicycle-related injuries: Helmets, Education and Legislation, Annual Review Public Health, 19, 293, 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.293 · DOI
  12. Rivara, 1997, Epidemiology of bicycle injuries and risk factors for serious injury, Injury Prevention, 3, 110, 10.1136/ip.3.2.110 · DOI
  13. Shafi, 1998, Impact of bicycle helmet safety legislation on children admitted to a regional pediatric trauma center, Journal Pediatric Surgery, 33, 317, 10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90454-7 · DOI
  14. Sharp, 1998, sbe16: Meta-analysis. In: H.J. Newton (Ed), The Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints. College Station, TX, Stata Corporation, 7, 100
  15. Spaite, 1991, A prospective analysis of injury severity among helmeted and nonhelmeted bicyclists involved in collisions with motor vehicles, Journal Trauma, 31, 1510, 10.1097/00005373-199111000-00008 · DOI
  16. Thomas, 1994, Effectiveness of bicycle helmets in preventing head injury in children: case control study, British Medical Journal, 308, 173, 10.1136/bmj.308.6922.173 · DOI
  17. Thompson, 1996, Effectiveness of bicycle safety helmets in preventing serious facial injury, Journal American Medical Association, 276, 1974, 10.1001/jama.1996.03540240052030 · DOI
  18. Thompson, 1998, Cycle helmets and the prevention of injuries. Recommendations for competitive sport, Sports Medicine, 25 (4), 213, 10.2165/00007256-199825040-00001 · DOI
  19. Thompson, 1996, Effectiveness of bicycle safety helmets in preventing head injuries. A case control study, Journal American Medical Association, 276, 1968, 10.1001/jama.1996.03540240046029 · DOI
  20. Thompson, 1990, A case-control study of the effectiveness of bicycle safety helmets in preventing facial injury, American Journal Public Health, 80, 1471, 10.2105/AJPH.80.12.1471 · DOI
  21. Thompson, 1989, A case-control study of the effectiveness of bicycle safety helmets, New England Journal Medicine, 320, 1361, 10.1056/NEJM198905253202101 · DOI
  22. Wasserman, 1990, Helmet protection from head injuries among recreational bicyclists, American Journal Sports Medicine, 18, 96, 10.1177/036354659001800116 · DOI
  23. Wasserman, 1988, Bicyclists, helmets and head injuries: a rider-based study of helmet use and effectiveness, American Journal Public Health, 78, 1220, 10.2105/AJPH.78.9.1220 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Attewell, R. G., Glase, K., & McFadden, M.
Venue
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-05
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
345-352
ISSN
0001-4575
Cited by
296
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review