CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 194Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementHeart rate and cardiovascular healthCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are β-blockers as efficacious in patients with diabetes mellitus as in patients without diabetes mellitus who have chronic heart failure? A meta-analysis of large-scale clinical trials

Haas, Steven Joseph, Vos, Theo, Gilbert, Richard E, Krum, Henry·2003·American Heart Journal
DOI 10.1016/s0002-8703(03)00403-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Diabetes mellitus is a frequent comorbid condition in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and confers a worse prognosis. Furthermore, although patients with CHF derive considerable benefit from beta-blockers, these agents are thought by many physicians to be contraindicated in patients with diabetes mellitus. Most published studies on beta-blockers in CHF have been unable to reach definitive conclusions about the mortality benefits of these agents in patients with diabetes mellitus. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of beta-blocker trials that reported mortality outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus who had CHF to pool all available trial evidence on the benefits (or otherwise) of these agents in this setting.Methods All-cause mortality data on patients with diabetes mellitus were obtained from all completed beta-blocker CHF randomized placebo-controlled trials involving >100 patients exposed to beta-blockers, in which outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus were described. When events were not directly reported, risk ratios (RRs) were derived from analysis of figures and other manuscript data. Results were pooled with the Mantel-Haenszel method.Results A total of 24.6% of patients were reported to have diabetes mellitus in the 6 studies analyzed (Australia and New Zealand [ANZ]-Carvedilol, Beta-blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial [BEST], Carvedilol US Trials, Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study [CIBIS-II], Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival Trial [COPERNICUS], and Metoprolol Controlled-release Randomized Intervention Trial in Heart Failure [MERIT-HF]). Patients with diabetes mellitus had increased mortality rates overall compared with subjects without diabetes mellitus (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.15-1.36; P <.001). Compared with placebo, beta-blocker therapy for CHF was beneficial in patients with diabetes mellitus (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.96; P =.011) and in subjects without diabetes mellitus (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.79; P <.001). The absolute risk reduction in mortality with beta-blocker therapy was greater in patients with heart failure but without diabetes mellitus than in patients with diabetes mellitus (P =.023).Conclusions Patients with diabetes mellitus and CHF appear to derive prognostic benefit from beta-blocker therapy, although the magnitude of that benefit is somewhat less than that observed in subjects without diabetes mellitus.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-8703(03)00403-4

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Mohacsi, 2001, Should physicians avoid the use of beta-blockers in patients with heart failure who have diabetes? Results of the COPERNICUS study, Circulation, 104, II-754
  2. Chavey, 2001, Guideline for the management of heart failure caused by systolic dysfunction, Am Fam Physician, 64, 1045

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 194

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Haas, S. J., Vos, T., Gilbert, R. E., & Krum, H.
Affiliations
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Krum, Henry
ORCID
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
146
Issue
5
Pages
848-853
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0002-8703(03)00403-4
OpenAlex
W1975966089
Cited by
194
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
beta-blockers, chronic heart failure, diabetes mellitus, all-cause mortality, carvedilol, bisoprolol, metoprolol, beta-blocker contraindication, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Failure, Humans, Comorbidity, Survival Rate, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review