Cited by 50Acute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsHealth disparities and outcomes

Impact of availability of hospital-based invasive cardiac services on racial differences in the use of these services

Gregory, Patrice M., Rhoads, George G., Wilson, Alan C., O’Dowd, Kenneth J., Kostis, John B.·1999·American Heart Journal

Abstract

Background Reports indicate that black patients are less likely than white patients to receive invasive cardiac services after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). There is still uncertainty as to why racial differences exist and how they affect patient outcomes. This is the first study to focus on the availability of invasive cardiac services and racial differences in procedure use. Study objectives were to (1) document whether racial differences existed in the use of invasive cardiac procedures, (2) study whether these racial differences were related to availability of hospital-based invasive cardiac services at first admission for AMI, and (3) determine whether there were racial differences in long-term mortality rates. Methods A historical cohort study was conducted with discharge records from all acute care hospitals in New Jersey for 1993 linked to death certificate records for 1993 and 1994. There were 13,690 black and white New Jersey residents hospitalized with primary diagnosis of AMI. Use of cardiac catheterization within 90 days, revascularization within 90 days (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA] or coronary artery bypass graft surgery [CABG]), and death within 1 year after admission for AMI were the main outcome measures. Patterns for PTCA and CABG as separate outcomes were also studied. Hospital-based cardiac services available were described as no invasive cardiac services, catheterization only, or PTCA/CABG. To account for…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70154-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study of more than 13,000 New Jersey residents, the likelihood of receiving catheterization within 90 days of an acute myocardial infarction was significantly greater if the patient was white.

    “In a study of more than 13,000 New Jersey residents, the likelihood of receiving catheterization within 90 days of an acute myocardial infarction was significantly greater if the patient was white [4].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gregory, P. M., Rhoads, G. G., Wilson, A. C., O’Dowd, K. J., & Kostis, J. B.
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-09
Volume
138
Issue
3
Pages
507-517
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171314405
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
racial disparities, acute myocardial infarction, invasive cardiac procedures, cardiac catheterization, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting, revascularization, black-white disparities, long-term mortality, Medicare beneficiaries, New Jersey hospitals, health care access, hospital discharge data
MeSH terms
Aged, Coronary Artery Bypass, Black or African American, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Cardiac Catheterization, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, New Jersey, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review