Cited by 166Health disparities and outcomesCultural Competency in Health CareRace, Genetics, and Society

Unequal treatment: report of the institute of medicine on racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare

Open access
Nelson, Alan R·2003·The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This symposium paper summarizes the Institute of Medicine's 2002 report *Unequal Treatment*, which concluded that racial and ethnic minorities in the U.S. receive lower-quality healthcare than the majority population across a wide range of conditions and settings, even after adjusting for access, clinical, and socioeconomic factors. It reviews the evidence (with emphasis on cardiovascular care), the committee's framework of contributing factors, and its recommendations for eliminating disparities.

Key findings

  • Disparities were found across a wide range of disease areas and clinical services—including cardiac care, cancer screening and treatment, diabetes management, end-stage renal disease, HIV treatment, pediatric care, maternal and child health, mental health, and many surgical procedures—even after correcting for comorbidities, stage of disease, and age.
  • In some instances minorities receive more of certain procedures: African Americans underwent bilateral orchiectomy and amputation at rates 2.4 and 3.6 times greater than their white Medicare peers. One study found Latino patients with long bone fractures in Los Angeles emergency rooms received pain medication only half as often as non-Latino patients.
  • In cardiovascular care, one analysis of more than 86,000 Medicare patients found whites were nearly four times more likely than African Americans to receive CABG after adjusting for age- and gender-related differences in MI rates; a study of more than 13,000 New Jersey residents found catheterization within 90 days of acute MI was significantly more likely for white patients.
  • The committee concluded that bias, stereotyping, prejudice, and clinical uncertainty on the part of providers may contribute to disparities, though the evidence base for these mechanisms is largely indirect; disparities diminish when socioeconomic factors are controlled but do not disappear.

Methods

  • The 15-member IOM committee met five times, conducted an extensive literature review (initial search yielded more than 600 citations), and used liaison panels, focus groups, and commissioned papers; it received testimony from educators, accrediting organizations, managed care representatives, medical historians, organized medicine, lawyers, and economists, and information from the military, VA, and federal agencies.
  • The committee defined "disparities" as racial or ethnic differences in quality of healthcare not due to access-related factors or clinical needs, preferences, and appropriateness of intervention, and analyzed at two levels: healthcare system operation and the legal/regulatory climate, and individual patient-provider discrimination.
  • For cardiovascular evidence specifically, 26 studies met inclusion criteria (published in the past 10 years, peer-reviewed, original findings, meeting established scientific principles); studies focused on health status or access were excluded.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: no single reviewed study simultaneously controlled for all variables likely to confound the race–care relationship; in almost all articles, disparities diminish once rigorous confounding variables are included in multivariate analysis, though most find significant disparities remain. Large administrative databases (e.g., Medicare) provide little or no information on comorbid illness, disease severity, or stage at detection. The evidence base on bias, stereotyping, and uncertainty is "in large part, indirect."
  • Stated in the paper: findings of equal quality were reported in some VA and military populations, and the committee "was not successful in identifying specific factors to account for this fact"; disparities in VA settings were "not consistent."
  • Evident from the text: this is a symposium summary of the IOM report rather than new primary research, so its findings rest on the committee's synthesis and the studies it selected; the paper also notes the committee avoided recommending unfunded mandates and was aware of practical difficulties in assuring availability of interpretation and related services.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01205-0

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

4 of 9 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation

    A very large national study with patients from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2, comprising 275,000 patients, and prospective controlled studies revealed clear differences in the likelihood of receipt of procedures during nearly every phase of diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease, with minority patients usually coming up short.

    “the very large national study with patients from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2, comprising 275,000 patients [5], and the prospective controlled studies [6] revealed clear differences in the likelihood of receipt of procedures during nearly every phase of diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease, with minority patients usually coming up short.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [5] Taylor, 1997, Can characteristics of a health care system mitigate ethnic bias in access to cardiovascular procedures? Experience from the military health services system, J Am Coll Cardiol source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 2 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [6] Peterson, 1997, Racial variation in the use of coronary-revascularization procedures, N Engl J Med source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    These differences were not found among white patients similarly deemed appropriate for invasive treatment.

    “These differences were not found among white patients similarly deemed appropriate for invasive treatment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Hemingway, 2001, Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization, N Engl J Med source

      The Results identify nonwhite race as a predictor of receiving medical treatment rather than CABG among appropriate candidates. The paper does not report a corresponding analysis showing that the unspecified 'differences' were absent among white patients (searched for white-patient and race-specific comparisons). (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    In a prospective study of 2552 patients seen in London hospitals who were deemed appropriate for cardiovascular procedures according to standardized criteria, nonwhite patients were more likely to receive only medical treatment, rather than CABG, after controlling for demographic and clinical variables.

    “in a prospective study of 2552 patients seen in London hospitals who were deemed appropriate for cardiovascular procedures according to standardized criteria, Hemingway and coworkers [9] found that nonwhite patients were more likely to receive only medical treatment, rather than CABG, after controlling for demographic and clinical variables.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Hemingway, 2001, Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization, N Engl J Med source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingnone given

    The quality of care received by racial and ethnic minorities in the United States is generally lower than that provided to the majority population.

    “the quality of care received by racial and ethnic minorities in this country is generally lower than that provided to the majority population.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    White patients have been found to use some clinical services at higher rates than minorities, even when not necessarily indicated.

    “White patients have been found to use some clinical services at higher rates than minorities, even when not necessarily indicated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 11
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Several studies find that African-American patients are more likely than whites to refuse invasive procedures, but when the relative contribution of patient refusal to racial differences in care is assessed, this factor is not found to account completely for these disparities.

    “Several studies find that African-American patients are more likely than whites to refuse invasive procedures, but when the relative contribution of patient refusal to racial differences in care is assessed, this factor is not found to account completely for these disparities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Disparities are associated with socioeconomic differences and diminish when socioeconomic factors are controlled, but they do not disappear.

    “We found that these disparities are associated with socioeconomic differences and diminish when socioeconomic factors are controlled, but they do not disappear.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For whites, CABG rates were significantly associated with the availability of thoracic surgeons and location in the Southeast, but physician availability and location were not correlated with CABG rates for African Americans.

    “For whites, CABG rates were significantly associated with the availability of thoracic surgeons and location in the Southeast, but physician availability and location were not correlated with CABG rates for African Americans.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Black patients were less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy and bypass surgery, even when only high-risk coronary anatomic subgroups were assessed.

    “Black patients were less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy and bypass surgery, even when only high-risk coronary anatomic subgroups were assessed [2]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] Petersen, 2002, Impact of race on cardiac care and outcomes in veterans with acute myocardial infarction, Med Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Disparities are present in cardiac care, cancer screening and treatment, diabetes management, end stage renal disease, treatment of HIV infection, pediatric care, maternal and child health, mental health, rehabilitative and nursing home services, and many surgical procedures.

    “Disparities are present in cardiac care, cancer screening and treatment, diabetes management, end stage renal disease, treatment of HIV infection, pediatric care, maternal and child health, mental health, rehabilitative and nursing home services, and many surgical procedures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Whites were more likely to receive inappropriate angiography, but the racial difference in rates of inappropriate percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not sufficiently large to account for more than a small fraction of the substantial disparities in rates of revascularization between white patients and African-American patients.

    “one study indicated that whites were more likely to receive inappropriate angiography, although the racial difference in rates of inappropriate percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not sufficiently large to account for more than a small fraction of the substantial disparities in rates of revascularization between white patients and African-American patients [7].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Schneider, 2001, Racial differences in cardiac revascularization rates. Does “overuse” explain higher rates among white patients?, Ann Intern Med source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In one study, cardiac catheterization was performed less often in nonwhites compared with whites, but angioplasty and bypass grafting were received equally often in white and nonwhite patients among those catheterized who had indications for revascularization.

    “in one study, although cardiac catheterization was performed less often in nonwhites when compared with whites, angioplasty and bypass grafting were received equally often in white and nonwhite patients among those catheterized who had indications for revascularization [8].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Scirica, 1999, Racial differences in the management of unstable angina, Am Heart J source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Racial and ethnic disparities in services are found among patients insured by Medicare and among patients in VA settings, although these findings are not consistent.

    “Racial and ethnic disparities in services are found among patients insured by Medicare and among patients in VA settings, although these findings are not consistent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Differences in refusal rates are generally small and minority patient refusal does not fully explain healthcare disparities.

    “These studies, however, find that differences in refusal rates are generally small and that minority patient refusal does not fully explain healthcare disparities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    There is no evidence to suggest that providers are more likely than the general public to express biases, and some evidence suggests that unconscious biases may exist.

    “there is no evidence to suggest that providers are more likely than the general public to express biases, and some evidence suggests that unconscious biases may exist.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Racial and ethnic disparities in health care occur in the context of broader historic and contemporary social and economic inequality, and evidence of persistent racial and ethnic discrimination in many sectors of American life.

    “Racial and ethnic disparities in health care occur in the context of broader historic and contemporary social and economic inequality, and evidence of persistent racial and ethnic discrimination in many sectors of American life.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Stereotyping can influence how information is processed and recalled.

    “It also can influence how information is processed and recalled.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    United States society still reflects attitudes and behaviors that can fairly be called discriminatory.

    “our society still reflects attitudes and behaviors that can fairly be called discriminatory”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Disparities in the quality of care may be reflective of inequalities in other aspects of American life, such as housing, jobs, and education.

    “Although disparities in the quality of care may be reflective of inequalities in other aspects of American life, such as housing, jobs, and education”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
14 of 14
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The existence of racial and ethnic disparities in health care is still largely unrecognized.

    “the committee believes that the existence of disparities is still largely unrecognized”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Public and professional awareness is an essential starting point for efforts at reduction of disparities.

    “public and professional awareness is an essential starting point for efforts at reduction”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Beneficence, as an element of professionalism, is supposed to be color blind.

    “beneficence, as an element of professionalism, is supposed to be color blind.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Racial and ethnic disparities in health care are unacceptable.

    “they are unacceptable”
4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, A. R.
Corresponding author
Nelson, Alan R
Venue
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-10
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
S1377-S1381
ISSN
0003-4975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076125949
Cited by
166
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
racial and ethnic disparities, health care disparities, Institute of Medicine report, quality of care, racial minorities, health equity
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Cardiology, Ethnicity, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Minority Groups, Prejudice, United States, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-14.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review