Cited by 95Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealthcare cost, quality, practices

The high cost of syncope: cost implications of a new insertable loop recorder in the investigation of recurrent syncope

Krahn, Andrew D., Klein, George J., Yee, Raymond, Mandab, Ven·1999·American Heart Journal

Abstract

Background Patients with recurrent syncope frequently undergo extensive investigations that consume significant health care resources. Recent advances in long-term monitoring techniques have enhanced diagnostic yield in patients with infrequent symptoms. There is little information on the relative cost-effective profile of the investigative tools used in patients with syncope. Methods Two methods to determine health care costs in patients with syncope were used. In the first, health care resource utilization was determined in 24 patients with recurrent unexplained syncope and negative investigations who underwent insertion of the implantable loop recorder (ILR) during a pilot study of the feasibility of the device. The costs of investigations before, during, and after ILR implantation in each patient were calculated on the basis of median charges for an index investigation and a regression analysis of 1018 US Medicare hospital claims for syncope from 1993. Charges were converted to costs using a cost-to-charge ratio of 0.64. The second method was based on estimated costs per diagnosis and published diagnostic yields of 6 commonly applied tests in patients with syncope. A cohort simulation using theoretic models of 100 patients undergoing investigation for syncope was created to compare the diagnostic yield and cost per diagnosis of various diagnostic cascades. Results In the pilot study, the cost of investigation of syncope in the 2 years before ILR insertion was $7584 per pa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70411-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 95

Authors
Krahn, A. D., Klein, G. J., Yee, R., & Mandab, V.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-05
Volume
137
Issue
5
Pages
870-877
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041770653
Cited by
95
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Keywords
recurrent syncope, unexplained syncope, implantable loop recorder, health care costs, diagnostic yield, diagnostic cascade, long-term monitoring, echocardiography, electrophysiologic testing, structural heart disease, cost-effectiveness, cost-to-charge ratio, cohort simulation, healthcare resource utilization, treatment costs, external loop recorder
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Echocardiography, Electrodes, Implanted, Electrophysiology, Follow-Up Studies, Medicare, Humans, Insurance Claim Review, Pilot Projects, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Syncope, United States, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Cost of Illness, Hospital Costs, Tilt-Table Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review