The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Limitations of catheter-based esophageal pH monitoring are discomfort, inconvenience, and interference with normal activity. An alternative to conventional pH monitoring is the wireless Medtronic Bravo pH System. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, performance, and tolerability of this system. METHODS: A total of 44 healthy subjects and 41 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were studied for a 2-day period. The pH telemetry capsule was positioned transorally 6 cm above the squamocolumnar junction using endoscopic measurement. The signal transmitted from the capsule was received and recorded by a small, pager-sized receiver, and pH data were subsequently uploaded to a computer for analysis. RESULTS: Successful 24-h pH studies were completed in 82 subjects (96%). During the 24-h study period the median percentage of the time that pH was <4 was 2.3% (95th percentile, 5.9%) in controls and 6.5% (range, 0.8-27.6) in GERD patients. In 76 subjects (89%), 36-48 h recordings were obtained. For the extended period the median percentage of the time that pH was <40 was 2.0% (95% percentile, 5.3%) in controls and 6.6% (range, 1.0-26.7) in GERD patients. Capsules required endoscopic removal in three subjects (4%). Optimal sensitivity in distinguishing controls from reflux patients was achieved when analyzed from the perspective of the worst of the 2 days. CONCLUSIONS: The wireless Bravo pH System successfully recorded esophageal acid exposure in 96% of the patients during a 24-h period and in 89% of subjects for >36 h. The 95th percentile for the 2-day recordings in control subjects was 5.3%, slightly higher than observed with conventional systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Updated Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
DeVault, K. R., & Castell, D. O. (2005) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41217.x · Cited by 1,130
Polymeric Biomaterials for Medical Implants and Devices
Teo, A. J. T., Mishra, A., Park, I., Kim, Y.-J., Park, W.-T., & Yoon, Y.-J. (2016) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00429 · Cited by 778
Unobtrusive Sensing and Wearable Devices for Health Informatics
Zheng, Y.-L., Ding, X.-R., Poon, C. C. Y., Lo, B. P. L., Zhang, H., Zhou, X.-L., Yang, G.-Z., Zhao, N., & Zhang, Y.-T. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2014.2309951 · Cited by 722
JONES, R., JUNGHARD, O., DENT, J., VAKIL, N., HALLING, K., WERNERSSON, B., & LIND, T. (2009) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04142.x · Cited by 721
Dent, J., Vakil, N., Jones, R., Bytzer, P., Schöning, U., Halling, K., Junghard, O., & Lind, T. (2010) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2009.200063 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Pandolfino, J.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 740-749
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001963043
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0002-9270(03)00062-5
- The paper
- Pandolfino, J. (2003). Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9270(03)00062-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.