The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intravenous cyclosporin in ulcerative colitis: a five-year experience
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Cyclosporin (CSA) is a promising alternative for patients with severe steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) previously facing only surgical options. Concerns over the long term efficacy and side effects resulted in this investigation of the University of Chicago's 5-yr CSA experience in these patients. METHODS: All steroid-refractory severe ulcerative colitis (UC) patients treated with IV CSA from 1991 to 1995 were identified by using the university's IBD database, with additional information from patient charts and physician files. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients with severe UC unresponsive to IV steroids were treated with IV CSA (4 mg/kg/day). Of 42 patients, 36 (86%) responded; 31 were continued on oral CSA (8 mg/kg/day) for an overall mean of 20 wk. Ten initial CSA responders had colectomies after a mean of 6 months. Of the 36 initial responders, 25 (69%) also received 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) or azathioprine (aza), and CSA and steroids were tapered. A total of 20% required colectomy, vs 45% of those not receiving 6MP/aza. In all, 62% of all patients, 72% of initial CSA responders, and 80% of initial CSA responders receiving 6MP/aza have avoided colectomy, with a life table analysis of "noncolectomy survival" of 58%, 70%, and 71%, respectively, at 5.5 yr. All colectomies occurred within 18 months of CSA initiation. Complications, resulting in CSA discontinuation in six patients, were all reversible, with complete recovery. CONCLUSIONS: CSA successfully allows most severe steroid resistant UC patients to retain their colons, and provides time for "elective" colectomy in others, especially if 6MP/aza are also given. Careful monitoring for side effects, including PCP prophylaxis, should be part of the treatment protocol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lamb, C. A., Kennedy, N. A., Raine, T., Hendy, P. A., Smith, P. J., Limdi, J. K., Hayee, B., Lomer, M. C. E., Parkes, G. C., Selinger, C., et al. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318484 · Cited by 2,346
Dignass, A., Lindsay, J. O., Sturm, A., Windsor, A., Colombel, J.-F., Allez, M., D'Haens, G., D'Hoore, A., Mantzaris, G., Novacek, G., et al. (2012) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2012.09.002 · Cited by 1,548
Harbord, M., Eliakim, R., Bettenworth, D., Karmiris, K., Katsanos, K., Kopylov, U., Kucharzik, T., Molnár, T., Raine, T., Sebastian, S., et al. (2017) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx009 · Cited by 1,180
Stange, E. F., Travis, S. P. L., Vermeire, S., Reinisch, W., Geboes, K., Barakauskiene, A., Feakins, R., Fléjou, J. F., Herfarth, H., Hommes, D. W., et al. (2008) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2007.11.001 · Cited by 555
Lichtenstein, G. R., Abreu, M. T., Cohen, R., & Tremaine, W. (2006) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2006.01.048 · Cited by 417
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, R.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1587-1592
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068255175
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intravenous cyclosporin in ulcerative colitis: a five-year experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0002-9270(99)00205-1
- The paper
- Cohen, R. (1999). Intravenous cyclosporin in ulcerative colitis: a five-year experience. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9270(99)00205-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.