Cited by 1,180Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeMicroscopic Colitis

Third European evidence-based consensus on diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis. Part 2: current management

Open access
Harbord, Marcus, Eliakim, Rami, Bettenworth, Dominik, Karmiris, Konstantinos, Katsanos, Konstantinos, Kopylov, Uri, Kucharzik, Torsten, Molnár, Tamás +6 more·2017·Journal of Crohn's and Colitis

Abstract

The treatment strategy for ulcerative colitis [UC] is mainly based on the severity, distribution [proctitis, left-sided, extensive]1 and pattern of disease. The latter includes relapse frequency, disease course, response to previous medications, side effects of medication, and extra-intestinal manifestations. Age at onset, and disease duration are also important factors. It is important to distinguish patients with severe UC necessitating hospital admission from those with mild or moderately active disease who can be managed as outpatients. The best validated and most widely used index for identifying severe UC remains that of Truelove and Witts.2 Patients with bloody stool frequency ≥ 6/day and a tachycardia [> 90 min−1], or temperature > 37.8°C, or anaemia [haemoglobin < 10.5 g/dl], or an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] [> 30 mm/h] have severe UC. Only one additional criterion in addition to the bloody stool frequency ≥ 6/day is needed to define a severe attack.3,4 In practice, a C-reactive protein [CRP] of 30 mg/l can be substituted for the ESR. A mesalamine 1-g suppository once daily is the preferred initial treatment for mild or moderately active proctitis [EL1]. Mesalamine foam or enemas are an alternative [EL1], but suppositories deliver the drug more effectively to the rectum and are better tolerated [EL3]. Topical mesalamine is more effective than topical steroids [EL1]. Combining topical mesalamine with oral mesalamine or topical steroids is more effective [EL2] Refractory proctitis may require treatment with systemic steroids, immunosuppressants, and/or biologics [EL4] Topical mesalamine [5-aminosalicylic acid or 5-ASA] is the first-line therapy for proctitis. A Cochrane systematic review of 38 clinical trials of treatment of proctitis and left-sided colitis confirmed its superiority over placebo for inducing symptomatic, endoscopic, histological response and remission.5 The pooled odds ratio [OR] was: 8.3 for symptomatic remission (8 trials, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.28–16.12; p < 0.00001); 5.3 for endoscopic remission [7 trials, 95% CI 3.15–8.92; p < 0.00001]; and 6.3 for histological remission [5 trials, 95% CI 2.74–14.40; p < 0.0001]. Suppositories are more appropriate than enemas in proctitis as they better target the site of inflammation and are more acceptable for patients.6 There is no dose response for topical therapy above a dose of 1 g 5-ASA daily.5,7 Once-daily topical therapy is as effective as divided doses.8,9 A meta-analysis found no difference between oral and topical 5-ASA for induction of remission (risk ratio [RR] for no remission with topical 5-ASA: 0.82, 95% CI 0.52–1.28) or time to remission [24.8 vs 25.5 days, respectively], but the trials included in this meta-analysis enrolled patients with UC of any extent, not specifically proctitis.10 In the single trial that included only patients with proctitis, rectal 5-ASA was more effective than oral 5-ASA alone.11 However, if oral 5-ASA is used alone, 3.6 g of a pH-dependent release preparation appears to be more effective than lower doses or placebo.12 Moreover in patients with proctosigmoiditis, 5-ASA granules rather than tablets are more likely to obtain clinical [78% vs 55%, p < 0.001] and endoscopic [67% vs 43%, p < 0.001] remission.13 The combination of oral and topical 5-ASA is more effective than either alone in patients with disease extending < 50 cm from the anal verge,14 although there is no trial of combination therapy for proctitis alone. Combining topical 5-ASA and topical steroids also helps: beclomethasone dipropionate [3 mg] and 5-ASA [2 g] enemas produced significantly better clinical, endoscopic, and histological improvement than either agent alone.15 Two meta-analyses have shown that topical 5-ASA is more effective than topical steroids, whether assessing symptomatic, endoscopic, or histological remission.16 Consequently topical steroids be to patients who have an or who are to topical A trial shown that g rectal foam alone is more than placebo in inducing remission at in patients with mild to vs p < drug not with topical and endoscopic be confirmed in those with to with oral topical 5-ASA and/or topical Refractory proctitis may require treatment with systemic steroids, or The of proctitis is in to moderately active left-sided ulcerative colitis be with an ≥ 1 with oral mesalamine ≥ [EL1], is more effective than oral or topical or topical steroids alone [EL1]. Topical mesalamine is more effective than topical steroids [EL1]. Once-daily with mesalamine is as effective as divided doses are appropriate in patients with to severe and in those with mild who not to mesalamine [EL1]. beclomethasone dipropionate and as oral in patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis can be in patients with mild to disease who are or to left-sided colitis is an for hospital admission oral and topical 5-ASA is the first-line therapy for mild to moderately active left-sided with an of to remission o

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx009

Cites

309 of 309 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harbord, M., Eliakim, R., Bettenworth, D., Karmiris, K., Katsanos, K., Kopylov, U., Kucharzik, T., Molnár, T., Raine, T., Sebastian, S., de Sousa, H. T., Dignass, A., Carbonnel, F., & for the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation [ECCO
Affiliations
  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital (GB)
  • Sheba Medical Center (IL)
  • University Hospital Münster (DE)
  • Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital d , Heraklion, Crete , Greece
  • University of Ioannina (GR)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Klinikum Lüneburg (DE)
  • University of Szeged (HU)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • Gastroenterology Department, Algarve Hospital Center; Biomedical Sciences & Medicine Department, University of Algarve k , Faro , Portugal
  • Agaplesion Markus Hospital (DE)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
Harbord, Marcus
Venue
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Published
2017-01-28
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
769-784
ISSN
  • 1873-9946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-4479
OpenAlex
W4210662453
Cited by
1,180
References
309
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 166 · 2021: 179 · 2020: 174 · 2019: 149 · 2018: 110 · 2017: 17
FWCI
81.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Crohn s and Colitis (publishedVersion)
  • SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium (University of Szeged) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Microscopic Colitis
Keywords
ulcerative colitis, proctitis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review