The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A prospective evaluation of esophageal testing and a double-blind, randomized study of omeprazole in a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for chronic cough
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Recent studies suggest an association between chronic cough and gastroesophageal reflux. Our study aims were 1) to define the prevalence of acid reflux induced cough in the general community, 2) to examine the ability of esophageal testing to identify gastroesophageal reflux related cough, and 3) to assess the utility of omeprazole in a chronic cough algorithm. METHODS: Patients with chronic cough of unknown etiology, who were mostly from the community, were evaluated. Subjects underwent a chest x-ray, methacholine challenge test, and empiric trial of postnasal drip therapy, and completed daily cough symptom diaries subjectively evaluating cough frequency and severity on a graded scale of 0-4 (combined maximum 8). After excluding other causes of cough, the remaining patients underwent esophageal and pH testing. Those testing positive were randomized to omeprazole 40 mg b.i.d. or placebo for 12 weeks. Follow-up was 1 yr. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were screened; 48 were excluded. Twenty-three patients were evaluated for gastroesophageal reflux disease; six (26%) were eventually determined to have an acid-related cough. Of these patients, 17 had a positive pH test, six (35%) of whom showed a striking improvement or resolution of their cough during omeprazole treatment which was sustained for up to 1 yr. Six had a negative pH test, none of whom responded to omeprazole therapy. No significant differences were seen between responders (n = 6) and nonresponders (n = 11) for demographic factors, baseline symptom frequency and duration, or physiological parameters (motility/pH). CONCLUSIONS: Acid-related chronic cough was present in 26% (six of 23) of patients evaluated for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophageal testing does not reliably identify patients with acid induced chronic cough responsive to proton pump inhibitor therapy. We suggest that the best diagnostic and therapeutic approach, after excluding asthma and postnasal drip syndrome, is empiric treatment for 2 wk with a high dose proton pump inhibitor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
(2006) · Encyclopedia of Sexual Behavior and the Law · doi:10.4135/9781452240107.n226 · Cited by 3,170
Locke, G., Talley, N., Fett, S., Zinsmeister, A., & Melton, L. (1997) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70025-8 · Cited by 2,095
Standardization of bronchial inhalation challenge procedures
Chai, H., Farr, R. S., Froehlich, L. A., Mathison, D. A., McLean, J. A., Rosenthal, R. R., Sheffer, A. L., Spector, S. L., & Townley, R. G. (1975) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/0091-6749(75)90107-4 · Cited by 1,453
Irwin, R. S., Curley, F. J., & French, C. L. (1990) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/141.3.640 · Cited by 827
Managing Cough as a Defense Mechanism and as a Symptom
Irwin, R. S., Boulet, L.-P., Cloutier, M. M., Fuller, R., Gold, P. M., Hoffstein, V., Ing, A. J., McCool, F. D., O’Byrne, P., Poe, R. H., et al. (1998) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.114.2_supplement.133s · Cited by 648
Richter, J. E., Wu, W. C., Johns, D. N., Blackwell, J. N., Nelson, J. L., Castell, J. A., & Castell, D. O. (1987) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01296157 · Cited by 535
Technique, indications, and clinical use of 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring
DeMeester, T. R., Wang, C.-I., Wernly, J. A., Pellegrini, C. A., Little, A. G., Klementschitsch, P., Bermudez, G. A., Johnson, L. F., & Skinner, D. B. (1980) · Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0022-5223(19)37879-1 · Cited by 528
Irwin, R. S., Corrao, W. M., & Pratter, M. R. (1981) · PubMed · doi:10.1164/arrd.1981.123.4.413 · Cited by 493
Fass, R., Fennerty, M. B., Ofman, J. J., Gralnek, I. M., Johnson, C., Camargo, E., & Sampliner, R. E. (1998) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70363-4 · Cited by 396
Asthma and gastroesophageal reflux: Acid suppressive therapy improves asthma outcome
Harding, S. M., Richter, J. E., Guzzo, M. R., Schan, C. A., Alexander, R. W., & Bradley, L. A. (1996) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(97)89514-9 · Cited by 386
Cited by
Prevalence, pathogenesis, and causes of chronic cough
Chung, K. F., & Pavord, I. D. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60595-4 · Cited by 665
Metadata
- Authors
- Ours, T.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3131-3138
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992698715
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 9.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective evaluation of esophageal testing and a double-blind, randomized study of omeprazole in a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for chronic cough. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0002-9270(99)00563-8
- The paper
- Ours, T. (1999). A prospective evaluation of esophageal testing and a double-blind, randomized study of omeprazole in a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for chronic cough. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9270(99)00563-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.