Cited by 52Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of verapamil and metoprolol in treatment of multifocal atrial tachycardia

Arsura, Edward, Lefkin, Alan S., Scher, David Lee, Solar, Mladen, Tessler, Sidney·1988·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Purpose Multifocal atrial tachycardia is a difficult arrhythmia to treat. Patients not showing a response to the correction of predisposing conditions present a therapeutic dilemma. To assess the efficacy of two agents reported to be effective in this condition, verapamil, metoprolol, or placebo was given intravenously in a randomized, double-blind trial.Patients and methods Thirteen patients meeting inclusionary criteria were enrolled. Therapeutic response was defined as conversion to sinus rhythm, a decline in the ventricular rate of 15 percent or more [corrected], or a ventricular rate of less than 100 beats/minute. Four male and nine female patients having a mean age (+/- SD) of 81.9 +/- 14.2 years were enrolled. Automated serum chemistries, complete blood cell count with differential, arterial blood gas values, and serum digoxin and theophylline levels were determined and a 12-lead electrocardiogram was obtained at the start of the trial. Following the completion of each phase of the study, a repeat physical examination was performed, and arterial blood gas values and an electrocardiogram were obtained. The trial was designed to run for two days.Results Two of 10 (20 percent), four of nine (44 percent), and eight of nine (89 percent) showed a response to placebo, verapamil, or metoprolol, respectively. Mean slowing of ventricular rate was 3.4, 7.3, and 24.5 percent for placebo, verapamil, and metoprolol, respectively (p less than 0.01 for metoprolol versus placebo). Five patients who showed a response to metoprolol had failed to have a response to verapamil.Conclusion We conclude that metoprolol appears to be more effective than verapamil in treating multifocal atrial tachycardia. However, careful patient selection is necessary in its use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9343(88)80088-3

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arsura, E., Lefkin, A. S., Scher, D. L., Solar, M., & Tessler, S.
Affiliations
Maimonides Medical Center (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-10
Volume
85
Issue
4
Pages
519-524
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086059677
Cited by
52
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (1989-01-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
multifocal atrial tachycardia, verapamil, metoprolol, intravenous antiarrhythmic therapy, ventricular rate control, conversion to sinus rhythm, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, elderly patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Clinical Trials as Topic, Double-Blind Method, Female, Heart Atria, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Metoprolol, Random Allocation, Tachycardia, Verapamil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review