The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk factors for nosocomial candidemia: A case-control study in adults without leukemia☆
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to define risk factors for nosocomial candidemia in adult patients without leukemia at a tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with nosocomial candidemia between August 1, 1981, and October 31, 1984, were included if they met strict selection criteria and did not have acute or chronic leukemia. For each case, one control was selected from among patients admitted during the same month/year and matched for hospital service and duration of hospitalization up to the first blood culture that grew Candida species. Logistic regression was used to obtain estimates of risk after simultaneously controlling for other variables. RESULTS: Candida albicans caused 24 of the 48 fungemias studied. The risk factors identified included the presence of a central line (odds ratio, 26.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 451.1); bladder catheter (13.0 1.3 to 131.4); two or more antibiotics (25.1, 2.1 to 318); azotemia (22.1, 2.2 to 223.2); transfer from another hospital (21.3, 1.7 to 274.5); diarrhea (10.2, 1.03 to 101.4); and candiduria (27.0, 1.7 to 423.5). A prior surgical procedure was associated with lowered risk (0.1, 0.01 to 0.9), suggesting perhaps that medical service patients are at higher risk than those on surgical services. Because total parenteral nutrition was always administered by means of a central line, it could not be shown to increase the risk over that conferred by a central line alone. CONCLUSIONS: This study has defined seven major risk factors for nosocomial candidemia. These findings should facilitate development of rational approaches to preventing infection and may assist clinicians in identifying those patients in whom this life-threatening complication is likely to occur.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biofilm formation as microbial development
O'Toole, G., Kaplan, H. B., & Kolter, R. (2000) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.49 · Cited by 3,571
Morrell, M., Fraser, V. J., & Kollef, M. H. (2005) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.49.9.3640-3645.2005 · Cited by 1,286
Fidel, P. L., Vazquez, J. A., & Sobel, J. D. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.1.80 · Cited by 953
Epidemiology of Candida species infections in critically ill non-immunosuppressed patients
Eggimann, P., Garbino, J., & Pittet, D. (2003) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00801-6 · Cited by 900
Candida Colonization and Subsequent Infections in Critically III Surgical Patients
Pittet, D., Monod, M., Suter, P. M., Frenk, E., & Auckenthaler, R. (1994) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199412000-00008 · Cited by 798
Metadata
- Authors
- Bross, J., Talbot, G. H., Greg, M., Shelley, H., & Strom, B. L.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 614-620
- ISSN
- 0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038285210
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk factors for nosocomial candidemia: A case-control study in adults without leukemia☆. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0002-9343(89)90719-5
- The paper
- Bross, J., Talbot, G. H., Greg, M., Shelley, H., & Strom, B. L. (1989). Risk factors for nosocomial candidemia: A case-control study in adults without leukemia☆. The American Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(89)90719-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.