Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 103Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesMaternal and fetal healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Uterine and umbilical artery velocimetry during normal labor

Open access
Fleischer, A., Anyaegbunam, A.A., Schulman, H., Farmakides, G., Randolph, G.·1987·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Twelve normal parturients were studied with a continuous wave Doppler unit to assess changes in uterine and umbilical velocity waveforms during labor. The analysis of these waveforms included the peak systolic/end-diastolic ratio and the evaluation of a diastolic notch. Each woman served as her own control, and all fetal heart rate tracings were normal. In latent phase labor and intact membranes, the umbilical artery systolic/end diastolic ratios before, during, and after a contraction were 2 +/- 0.2, 2 +/- 0.3 and 1.95 +/- 0.3 (N.S.). Similar results were obtained in the active phase, after rupture of membranes, or during oxytocin stimulation. This stability of the fetal cardiovascular system ensures an uninterrupted gas exchange process during the contractions (on the fetal side), enabling the great majority of term fetuses to tolerate labor with minimal if any metabolic changes. The uterine artery end-diastolic velocity fell progressively during the contraction, reaching 0 when the intrauterine pressure exceeded 35 mm Hg. Despite intrauterine pressure of greater than 60 mm Hg, the diastolic notch did not appear. Thus at term, the umbilical artery velocity waveform does not change over a wide range of uterine pressures. The changes seen in the uterine artery waveforms suggest that the end-diastolic component is primarily determined by changes in the arcuate and spiral arteries, both of which are affected during the uterine contraction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80342-3

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 103

Metadata

Authors
Fleischer, A., Anyaegbunam, A. A., Schulman, H., Farmakides, G., & Randolph, G.
Affiliations
Winthrop-University Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Fleischer, A.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-07
Volume
157
Issue
1
Pages
40-43
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026754444
Cited by
103
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
Keywords
uterine artery, umbilical artery, uterine contraction, labor, Doppler velocimetry, systolic/diastolic ratio, diastolic notch, fetal cardiovascular system, intrauterine pressure, term pregnancy
MeSH terms
Blood Flow Velocity, Female, Humans, Labor, Obstetric, Pregnancy, Rheology, Umbilical Arteries, Uterine Contraction, Uterus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uterine and umbilical artery velocimetry during normal labor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80342-3
The paper
Fleischer, A., Anyaegbunam, A. A., Schulman, H., Farmakides, G., & Randolph, G. (1987). Uterine and umbilical artery velocimetry during normal labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80342-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.