Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

BRCA1, BRCA2, and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer gene mutations in an unselected ovarian cancer population: Relationship to family history and implications for genetic testing

Open access
Rubin, Stephen C., Blackwood, M.Anne, Bandera, Christina, Behbakht, Kian, Benjamin, Ivor, Rebbeck, Timothy R., Boyd, Jeff·1998·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective: Our purpose was to determine the prevalence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer gene mutations in a large, unselected population of ovarian cancer patients and to evaluate the relationship between mutation status and a routinely obtained family history of cancer. Study Design: One hundred sixteen consecutive ovarian cancer patients seen for routine clinical care were examined for BRCA1, BRCA2, hMSH2, and hMLH1 gene mutations with use of the polymerase chain reaction, single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis, and direct gene sequencing. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate possible associations between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status and specific familial characteristics. Results: Among 116 unselected ovarian cancer patients we identified a total of 13 germline mutations in 12 patients: 10 in BRCA1, one each in hMSH2 and hMLH1, and a single BRCA2 mutation, which occurred in a patient also carrying a BRCA1 mutation. More than half the patients with BRCA1 mutations had family histories that would generally be considered unremarkable. Of 22 family history variables analyzed, only two (maternal family history of breast or ovarian cancer, p = 0.037, and maternal family history of any cancer, p = 0.020) conferred a significantly increased risk of carrying a BRCA1 mutation compared with ovarian cancer patients without such a history. However, the majority of ovarian cancer patients with these family histories and other suggestive histories tested negative for mutations. Conclusions: Approximately 10% of ovarian cancers occur in association with genetic mutations known to predispose to the disease. A routinely obtained family history is an unreliable way to identify patients who might harbor mutations. The majority of ovarian cancer patients with suggestive family histories test negative for known gene mutations, perhaps suggesting the existence of additional undiscovered genes predisposing to ovarian cancer. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:670-7.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70476-4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Rubin, S. C., Blackwood, M. A., Bandera, C., Behbakht, K., Benjamin, I., Rebbeck, T. R., & Boyd, J.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-04
Volume
178
Issue
4
Pages
670-677
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070953479
Cited by
179
References
0
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BRCA1, BRCA2, and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer gene mutations in an unselected ovarian cancer population: Relationship to family history and implications for genetic testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70476-4
The paper
Rubin, S. C., Blackwood, M. A., Bandera, C., Behbakht, K., Benjamin, I., Rebbeck, T. R., & Boyd, J. (1998). BRCA1, BRCA2, and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer gene mutations in an unselected ovarian cancer population: Relationship to family history and implications for genetic testing. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70476-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.