Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 526

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Five-year Follow-up of the Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study

Open access
THE FLUOROURACIL FILTERING SURGERY STUDY GROUP·1996·American Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of subconjunctival 5- fluorouracil injections after trabeculectomy in patients with poor prognoses, to determine risk factors for surgical failure and to examine the relationship of intraocular pressure and visual function. METHODS: In this multicenter clinical trial, 213 patients with previous cataract surgery or previous failed filtering surgery were randomly assigned to receive either trabeculectomy alone or trabeculectomy with postoperative subconjunctival 5-fluorouracil injections. Measurements of intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and visual fields were performed throughout the five years, with the clinician masked to the treatment group. Failure was defined as a reoperation to control intraocular pressure or an intraocular pressure greater than 21 mm Hg at or after the first-year examination. RESULTS: Fifty-four (51%) of the 105 eyes in the 5-fluorouracil group and 80 (74%) of the 108 eyes in the standard filtering surgery group were classified as failures (P < .001, Mantel-Cox survival analysis). Risk factors for failure include high intraocular pressure, a short time interval after the last procedure involving a conjunctival incision, the number of procedures with conjunctival incisions, and Hispanic ethnicity. Patients in both treatment groups with controlled intraocular pressures were more likely to maintain visual acuity. Patients in the 5-fluorouracil group had a higher risk of late-onset bleb leaks (9% nine of 105) than those in the standard filtering surgery group (2% two of 108) (P = .032, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the use of subconjunctival 5-fluorouracil after trabeculectomy in eyes after previous cataract surgery or unsuccessful filtering surgery, but caution against its routine use in patients with good prognoses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70431-3

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 526

Metadata

Authors
THE FLUOROURACIL FILTERING SURGERY STUDY GROUP
Venue
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-04
Volume
121
Issue
4
Pages
349-366
ISSN
0002-9394 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3142292247
Cited by
526
References
0
FWCI
32.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Five-year Follow-up of the Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70431-3
The paper
THE FLUOROURACIL FILTERING SURGERY STUDY GROUP. (1996). Five-year Follow-up of the Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study. American Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70431-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.