Cited by 104Cultural Heritage Materials AnalysisCold Fusion and Nuclear ReactionsDyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers

Physics and chemistry of the shroud of turin

Schwalbe, L.A., Rogers, R.N.·1982·Analytica Chimica Acta

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)85263-6

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Small dark spots visible in small quantities are small iron oxide particles.

    “Small dark spots were visible in small quantities and do not reflect at all under UV light, which leads us to believe these are small iron oxide particles (Morris et al. 1980;Schwalbe and Rogers 1982).”

    From Investigating a Dated Piece of the Shroud of Turin (2010) · cites this paper as Schwalbe and Rogers 1982

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwalbe, L. A., & Rogers, R. N.
Affiliations
Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Analytica Chimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1982-02
Volume
135
Issue
1
Pages
3-49
ISSN
0003-2670 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032767816
Cited by
104
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 10
FWCI
25.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Analytica Chimica Acta (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Cold Fusion and Nuclear Reactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
Keywords
Shroud of Turin, image formation, cellulose oxidation, dehydration reactions, radiocarbon dating, bloodstains, historical authenticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review