Cited by 56Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchNatural Compounds in Disease Treatment

A pilot study of a long acting somatostatin analogue for the treatment of refractory rheumatoid arthritis

Open access
Paran, D, Elkayam, O, Mayo, A, Paran, H, Amit, M, Yaron, M, Caspi, D·2001·Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a long acting somatostatin analogue in a subset of patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods Ten patients with active, refractory RA, who had failed to respond to at least four disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), were treated with monthly intramuscular injections of 20 mg of a long acting preparation of octreotide (Sandostatin-LAR) for three months. They were evaluated every two weeks in an open label pilot study. The primary measure of clinical response was the American College of Rheumatology criteria for a 20% improvement in measures of disease activity (ACR 20).Results Eight patients completed the 14 week trial, while two patients received only one or two doses of the somatostatin analogue, but were eligible for evaluation. On an intention to treat basis 6/10 patients responded: four patients met the ACR 20 criteria at weeks 6-10, while two patients continued to improve with time, and met the ACR 50 and 70 criteria respectively, at week 14. On evaluation of the 10 patients as a group, a significant improvement (p<0.05) was noted in the mean visual analogue scales of pain, doctor's and patient's global assessment of disease activity, and in the mean number of swollen joints. Adverse effects were minor: transient bloating and loose stools, an urticarial rash (n=1), and a transient increase of liver enzymes (n=1).Conclusion Treatment with a long acting somatostatin analogue led to significant clinical improvement in a subset of patients with active, refractory RA. The treatment was relatively safe and well tolerated. Further large, placebo controlled studies are required to evaluate this drug as a potential DMARD for patients with RA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0003-4967(24)43390-6

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Open therapies with the growth hormone inhibitor somatostatin in small studies demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects such as reduction of synovial membrane thickness and improved clinical symptoms such as morning stiffness and other American College of Rheumatology criteria in rheumatoid arthritis.

    “Open therapies with the growth hormone inhibitor somatostatin in small studies demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects such as reduction of synovial membrane thickness [123] and improved clinical symptoms such as morning stiffness and other American College of Rheumatology criteria in RA [124,125].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 2 Reichlin S. Neuroendocrine interactions. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1246-53.
  2. 18 Tugwell P, Wells G, Strand V, Maetzel A, Bombardier C, Crawford B, et al . Clinical improvement as reflected in measures of function and health related quality of life following treatment with leflunomide compared with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:506-14.
  3. 19 Anderson JJ, Wells G, Verhoeven AC, Felson DT. Factors predicting response to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:22-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paran, D., Elkayam, O., Mayo, A., Paran, H., Amit, M., Yaron, M., & Caspi, D.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-09
Volume
60
Issue
9
Pages
888-891
ISSN
0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122650959
Cited by
56
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Natural Compounds in Disease Treatment
Keywords
refractory rheumatoid arthritis, somatostatin analogues, octreotide, long-acting octreotide, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, intramuscular injection, ACR20 response, disease activity, pain, adverse effects, liver enzymes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Delayed-Action Preparations, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Pilot Projects, Octreotide, Treatment Outcome, Antirheumatic Agents, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review