Cited by 272Esophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentEsophageal and GI PathologyGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Esophageal Resection for Cancer of the Esophagus: Long-Term Function and Quality of Life

Open access
McLarty, Allison J, Deschamps, Claude, Trastek, Victor F, Allen, Mark S, Pairolero, Peter C, Harmsen, William S·1997·The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Abstract

Background Information on function and quality of life of long-term survivors after esophageal resection for carcinoma is limited. Methods Between 1972 and 1990, 359 patients underwent esophagectomy for stage I or II esophageal carcinoma at Mayo Clinic. We evaluated long-term function and quality of life in 107 of these patients (81 men and 26 women) who survived 5 or more years. Median age at operation was 62 years (range, 30 to 81 years). The operation performed was an Ivor Lewis resection in 77 patients (72%), transhiatal esophagectomy in 14 (13%), extended esophagectomy in 4 (4%), thoracoabdominal esophagectomy in 4 (4%), and other in 8 (7%). Adenocarcinoma was present in 72 patients (67%), squamous cell carcinoma in 28 (26%), and other in 7 (7%). Thirty-four patients (32%) were in postsurgical stage I, 65 (61%) in stage IIA, and 8 (8%) in stage IIB. Median survival was 10.2 years (range, 5.0 to 23.2 years). Follow-up was complete for all patients. Results Gastroesophageal reflux was present in 64 patients (60%), symptoms of dumping in 53 (50%), and dysphagia to solid food in 27 (25%). Seventeen patients (16%) were asymptomatic. Factors affecting late functional outcome were analyzed. Patients who had a cervical anastomosis had significantly fewer reflux symptoms (p < 0.05). Dumping syndrome occurred more frequently in younger patients (p < 0.05) and women (p < 0.01). Quality of life was assessed separately by the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and compared with the national norm. Scores measuring physical functioning were decreased (p < 0.01). Scores measuring ability to work, social interaction, daily activities, emotional dysfunction, perception of health, and levels of energy were similar. Mental health scores were higher (p < 0.05). Conclusions We conclude that long-term functional outcome after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma is affected by age, sex, and type of reconstruction. Quality of life as judged by the patients is similar to the national norm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00125-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dumping syndrome is a common complication of esophageal, gastric or bariatric surgery.

    “Dumping syndrome, a common complication of esophageal, gastric or bariatric surgery, includes early and late dumping symptoms.”

    From Dumping syndrome after esophageal, gastric or bariatric surgery: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management (2017) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Functional Outcome passage (page not supplied) reports postprandial dumping symptoms in 53 of 107 long-term survivors after esophageal resection, supporting that dumping is common in this group. The cited passages do not establish how common it is after gastric or bariatric surgery. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dumping syndrome has been reported to occur in approximately 20% of patients who undergo vagotomy with pyloroplasty, in up to 40% of patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy, and in up to 50% of patients who undergo esophagectomy.

    “Dumping syndrome has been reported to occur in approximately 20% of patients who undergo vagotomy with pyloroplasty, in up to 40% of patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy, and in up to 50% of patients who undergo esophagectomy (3)(4)(5)(6)(7).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. O'Rourke I, Tait N, Bull C, Gebski V, Holland M, Johnson DC. Oesophageal cancer: outcome of modern surgical man- agement. Aust N Z J Surg 1995;65:11-6.
  2. King RM, Pairolero PC, Trastek VF, Payne WS, Bernatz PE. Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus: early and late functional results. Ann Thorac Surg 1987;44:119-22.
  3. Vigneswaran WT, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC, Deschamps C, Daly RC, Allen MS. Transhiatal esophagectomy for carci- noma of the esophagus. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:838-46.
  4. Vigneswaran WT, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC, Deschamps C, Daly RC, Allen MS. Extended esophagectomy in the man- agement of carcinoma of the upper thoracic esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:901-7.
  5. Lizuka T, Isono K, Kakegawa T, Watanabe H. Parameters linked to ten-year survival in Japan of resected esophageal carcinoma. Chest 1989;96:1005-11.
  6. Pera M, Cameron AJ, Trastek VF, Carpenter HA, Zinsmeis- ter AR. Increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Gastroenterology 1993;104:510-3.
  7. Pera M, Trastek VF, Carpenter HA, Allen MS, Deschamps C, Pairolero PC. Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: an indication for esophagectomy? Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54: 199 -204.
  8. Edwards MJ, Gable DR, Lentsch AB, Richardson JD. The rationale for esophagectomy as the optimal therapy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. Ann Surg 1996;223:585-91.
  9. Gelfand GAJ, Finley RJ. Quality of life with carcinoma of the esophagus. World J Surg 1994;18:399 -405.
  10. Beahrs OH, Henson DE, Hutter RV, Kennedy BJ. American Joint Commission on Cancer: manual for staging of cancer. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1992:59.
  11. Dixon WJ, Massey FJ Jr. Introduction to statistical analysis. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969:77-80, 116 -8, 156 -63, 344 -5, 509.
  12. Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sci- ences. 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956:63-83, 104 -11, 161-72, 175-9, 184 -93.
  13. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non-parametric estimation from incom- plete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-81.
  14. Suzuki H, Shichisaburo A, Kitamura M, Hashimoto M, Izumi K, Sato H. An evaluation of symptoms and performance status in patients after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from the viewpoint of the patient. Am Surg 1994;60:920-3.
  15. Nishihira T, Watanabe T, Ohmori N, et al. Long-term eval- uation of patients treated by radical operation for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. World J Surg 1984;8:778-85.
  16. Collard J-M, Otte J-B, Reynaert M, Kestens P-J. Quality of life three years or more after esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:391-4.
  17. De Leyn P, Coosemans W, Lerut T. Early and late functional results in patients with intrathoracic gastric replacement after oesophagectomy for carcinoma. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 1992;6:79-85.
  18. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Stirling MC. Transhiatal esopha- gectomy for benign and malignant disease. J Thorac Cardio- vasc Surg 1993;105:265-77.
  19. Finley RJ, Lamy A, Clifton J, Evans KG, Fradet G, Nelems B. Gastrointestinal function following esophagectomy for ma- lignancy. Am J Surg 1995;169:471-5.
  20. Iannettoni MD, Whyte RI, Orringer MB. Catastrophic com- plications of the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:1493-501.
  21. Blazeby JM, Williams MH, Brookes ST, Alderson D, Farndon JR. Quality of life measurement in patients with oesophageal cancer. Gut 1995;37:505-8.
  22. Van Knippenberg FCE, Out JJ, Tilanus HW, Mud HJ, Hop WCJ, Verhage F. Quality of life in patients with resected oesophageal cancer. Soc Sci Med 1992;35:139-45.
  23. Kuwano H, Ikebe M, Baba K, et al. Operative procedures of reconstruction after resection of esophageal cancer and the postoperative quality of life. World J Surg 1993;17:773-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLarty, A. J., Deschamps, C., Trastek, V. F., Allen, M. S., Pairolero, P. C., & Harmsen, W. S.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Deschamps, Claude
Venue
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-06
Volume
63
Issue
6
Pages
1568-1571
ISSN
0003-4975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094315259
Cited by
272
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Keywords
esophageal cancer, esophagectomy, long-term functional outcome, quality of life, gastroesophageal reflux, dumping syndrome, dysphagia, cervical anastomosis, esophageal reconstruction, adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, physical function, age and sex effects, late complications, long-term survivors, SF-36
MeSH terms
Actuarial Analysis, Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Cause of Death, Deglutition, Deglutition Disorders, Esophageal Neoplasms, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heartburn, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Quality of Life, Sex Factors, Survival Rate, Confidence Intervals, Esophagectomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review