Cited by 35Gastrointestinal motility and disordersBariatric Surgery and OutcomesGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment

A pilot study of the effects of the somatostatin analog pasireotide in postoperative dumping syndrome

Deloose, E., Bisschops, R., Holvoet, L., Arts, J., De Wulf, D., Caenepeel, P., Lannoo, M., Vanuytsel, T. +2 more·2014·Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Abstract

Background Dumping syndrome is characterized by distinct pathophysiological features such as postprandial increase in hematocrit (HT) and pulse rate (PR) and delayed hypoglycemia (HG). Treatment is based on dietary measures and somatostatin analogs (SA), but current SAs have incomplete efficacy, possibly through limited affinity for various somatostatin receptor subtypes. We evaluated the effect of pasireotide, a novel SA with high affinity for 4/5 human somatostatin receptors, on pathophysiological events and symptoms in dumping. Methods Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study of nine patients (six women, 47 ± 4 years) with postoperative dumping. Baseline measurements included oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT), abdominal ultrasound, and dumping symptom severity score (DSSS). Patients were treated for 2 weeks with placebo or pasireotide 300 μg s.c. t.i.d. with a 1-week wash-out in a randomized fashion. On day 13 and 14 of each treatment OGTT, DSSS, and solid and liquid gastric emptying (GE) were obtained. Key results Baseline OGTT was pathological in all patients based on PR (n = 5), HT (n = 1) or HG (n = 7). Compared to placebo, pasireotide suppressed the increase in PR (17.1 ± 2.8 vs 8.2 ± 3.5 bpm; p Conclusions & inferences Pasireotide affects pathophysiological features of both early and late dumping syndrome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nmo.12333

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deloose, E., Bisschops, R., Holvoet, L., Arts, J., De Wulf, D., Caenepeel, P., Lannoo, M., Vanuytsel, T., Andrews, C., & Tack, J.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • Gastroenterology University Hospital Gasthuisberg Leuven Belgium
Corresponding author
Tack, J.
Venue
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-20
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
803-809
ISSN
  • 1350-1925 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2982
OpenAlex
W2091904215
Cited by
35
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurogastroenterology & Motility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
pasireotide, somatostatin analogues, postprandial hypoglycemia, gastric emptying, glucose tolerance
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Double-Blind Method, Dumping Syndrome, Female, Hormones, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Placebos, Postoperative Complications, Severity of Illness Index, Somatostatin, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review