The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The REMATCH trial: rationale, design, and end points
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Because left ventricular assist devices have recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration to support the circulation of patients with end-stage heart failure awaiting cardiac transplantation, these devices are increasingly being considered as a potential alternative to biologic cardiac replacement. The Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) trial is a multicenter study supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to compare long-term implantation of left ventricular assist devices with optimal medical management for patients with end-stage heart failure who require, but do not qualify to receive cardiac transplantation. METHODS: We discuss the rationale for conducting REMATCH, the obstacles to designing this and other randomized surgical trials, the lessons learned in conducting the multicenter pilot study, and the features of the REMATCH study design (objectives, target population, treatments, end points, analysis, and trial organization). CONCLUSIONS: We consider what will be learned from REMATCH, expectations for expanding the use of left ventricular assist devices, and future directions for assessing clinical procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736
The SOLVD Investigators* (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108013250501 · Cited by 8,029
Properties of permuted-block randomization in clinical trials
Matts, J. P., & Lachin, J. M. (1988) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(88)90047-5 · Cited by 321 · cited 1×
“The randomization will be stratified by center and blocked to ensure approximately equal numbers of patients in each arm of the trial throughout its course, thereby facilitating efficient interim analyses [19].”
Background
Cited by
WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, Hunt, S. A., Abraham, W. T., Chin, M. H., Feldman, A. M., Francis, G. S., Ganiats, T. G., Jessup, M., Konstam, M. A., Mancini, D. M., et al. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.167586 · Cited by 2,251
Self-citationHunt, S. A., Baker, D. W., Chin, M. H., Cinquegrani, M. P., Feldman, A. M., Francis, G. S., Ganiats, T. G., Goldstein, S., Gregoratos, G., Jessup, M. L., et al. (2001) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01683-7 · Cited by 1,912
Self-citationCommittee Members, Hunt, S. A., Baker, D. W., Chin, M. H., Cinquegrani, M. P., Feldmanmd, A. M., Francis, G. S., Ganiats, T. G., Goldstein, S., Gregoratos, G., et al. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/hc4901.102568 · Cited by 1,442
Self-citationHunt, S. A., Abraham, W. T., Chin, M. H., Feldman, A. M., Francis, G. S., Ganiats, T. G., Jessup, M., Konstam, M. A., Mancini, D. M., Michl, K., et al. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.013 · Cited by 1,374
Self-citationInteractions of the heart and the liver
Møller, S., & Bernardi, M. (2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht246 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Rose, E. A., Moskowitz, A. J., Packer, M., Sollano, J. A., Williams, D. L., Tierney, A. R., Heitjan, D. F., Meier, P., Ascheim, D. D., Levitan, R. G., Weinberg, A. D., Stevenson, L. W., Shapiro, P. A., Lazar, R. M., Watson, J. T., Goldstein, D. J., & Gelijns, A. C.
- Venue
- The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 723-730
- ISSN
- 0003-4975 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036444290
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 24.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The REMATCH trial: rationale, design, and end points. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00042-9
- The paper
- Rose, E. A., Moskowitz, A. J., Packer, M., Sollano, J. A., Williams, D. L., Tierney, A. R., Heitjan, D. F., Meier, P., Ascheim, D. D., Levitan, R. G., Weinberg, A. D., Stevenson, L. W., Shapiro, P. A., Lazar, R. M., Watson, J. T., Goldstein, D. J., & Gelijns, A. C. (1999). The REMATCH trial: rationale, design, and end points. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00042-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.