CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 159Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incidence of chronic pain following traumatic brain injury

Lahz, Sophia, Bryant, Richard A·1996·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
DOI 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90275-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective To index the frequency of reported chronic pain in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).Design A case series study was conducted on consecutive patients with TBI.Setting TBI patients were recruited from an adult tertiary care center brain injury clinic.Patients A consecutive sample of 132 patients who attended a brain injury rehabilitation center after TBI. The sample included 53 mild and 79 moderate/severe TBI patients.Outcome measures Patients were administered a protocol that indexed pain site, frequency, severity, and duration.Results Chronic pain was reported by 58% of mild TBI and 52% of moderate/severe TBI patients. Headaches were the most commonly reported pain problem. Chronic headaches were reported by 47% of mild TBI patients and 34% of moderate/ severe TBI patients. Neck/shoulder, back, upper limb, and lower limb pain were reported similarly by mild and moderate/severe TBI patients.Conclusions Findings indicate that chronic pain is a significant problem in mild and moderate/severe TBI patients. More effective diagnosis of TBI patients with chronic pain may facilitate rehabilitation of these patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90275-0

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 159

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lahz, S., & Bryant, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Westmead Hospital (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Bryant, Richard A
ORCID
Bryant, Richard A
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-09
Volume
77
Issue
9
Pages
889-891
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90275-0
OpenAlex
W2042639961
Cited by
159
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
chronic pain, traumatic brain injury, mild traumatic brain injury, moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, headache, neck and shoulder pain, back pain, brain injury rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Injuries, Chronic Disease, Headache, Humans, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Incidence, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review