The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods for task allocation via agent coalition formation
Open accessAbstract
Task execution in multi-agent environments may require cooperation among agents. Given a set of agents and a set of tasks which they have to satisfy, we consider situations where each task should be attached to a group of agents that will perform the task. Task allocation to groups of agents is necessary when tasks cannot be performed by a single agent. However it may also be beneficial when groups perform more efficiently with respect to the single agents' performance. In this paper we present several solutions to the problem of task allocation among autonomous agents, and suggest that the agents form coalitions in order to perform tasks or improve the efficiency of their performance. We present efficient distributed algorithms with low ratio bounds and with low computational complexities. These properties are proven theoretically and supported by simulations and an implementation in an agent system. Our methods are based on both the algorithmic aspects of combinatorics and approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems. We first present an approach to agent coalition formation where each agent must be a member of only one coalition. Next, we present the domain of overlapping coalitions. We proceed with a discussion of the domain where tasks may have a precedence order. Finally, we discuss the case of implementation in an open, dynamic agent system. For each case we provide an algorithm that will lead agents to the formation of coalitions, where each coalition is assigned a task. Our algorithms are any-time algorithms, they are simple, efficient and easy to implement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1979) · Cited by 43,841
Rayward-Smith, V. J. (1991) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1991.155 · Cited by 16,821
Shapley, L. S. (1988) · The Shapley Value · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511528446.003 · Cited by 4,954
The Contract Net Protocol: High-Level Communication and Control in a Distributed Problem Solver
Smith (1980) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.1980.1675516 · Cited by 3,716
(2015) · Adversarial Risk Analysis · doi:10.1201/b18653-3 · Cited by 3,632
A Greedy Heuristic for the Set-Covering Problem
Chvatal, V. (1979) · Mathematics of Operations Research · doi:10.1287/moor.4.3.233 · Cited by 2,581
Contributions to the theory of games.
(1960) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(60)90366-5 · Cited by 1,824
Rational Behaviour and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations
Harsanyi, J. C. (1977) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571756 · Cited by 1,431
Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving
Davis, R., & Smith, R. G. (1983) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(83)90015-2 · Cited by 1,230
Contributions to the Theory of Games
Rubin, H., Kuhn, H. W., & Tucker, A. W. (1952) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1907817 · Cited by 1,198
Cited by
A Formal Analysis and Taxonomy of Task Allocation in Multi-Robot Systems
Gerkey, B. P., & Matarić, M. J. (2004) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364904045564 · Cited by 1,753
On agent-based software engineering
Jennings, N. R. (2000) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(99)00107-1 · Cited by 1,635
A survey of multi-agent organizational paradigms
HORLING, B., & LESSER, V. (2004) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888905000317 · Cited by 709
On agent-mediated electronic commerce
He, M., Jennings, N. R., & Leung, H.-F. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2003.1209014 · Cited by 389
A taxonomy for task allocation problems with temporal and ordering constraints
Nunes, E., Manner, M., Mitiche, H., & Gini, M. (2017) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2016.10.008 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Shehory, O., & Kraus, S.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 165-200
- ISSN
- 0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971441460
- Cited by
- 1,080
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 12.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods for task allocation via agent coalition formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0004-3702(98)00045-9
- The paper
- Shehory, O., & Kraus, S. (1998). Methods for task allocation via agent coalition formation. Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(98)00045-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.