The role of developmental factors in planning behavioral interventions for children: Disruptive behavior as an example
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conformity to peers peaks during early adolescence, as social acceptance becomes more important.
“That is, conformity to peers peaks during this developmental period, as social acceptance becomes more important”
From School-based programmes to reduce and prevent substance use in different age groups: What works for whom? Systematic review and meta-regression analysis (2016) · cites this paper as Forehand & Wierson, 1994
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 130
- Authors
- Forehand, R., & Wierson, M.
- Affiliations
- Pomona College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Forehand, Rex
- ORCID
- Forehand, Rex
- Venue
- Behavior Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-141
- ISSN
- 0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093943790
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 6.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
- Keywords
- developmental factors, child behavior therapy, disruptive behavior, behavioral interventions, developmental tasks, developmental trajectories, children and adolescents, intervention design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
