Cited by 48Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

‘Minor GAD’: Characteristics of subsyndromal GAD in older adults

Diefenbach, Gretchen J., Hopko, Derek R., Feigon, Sarah, Stanley, Melinda A., Novy, Diane M., Beck, J.Gayle, Averill, Patricia M.·2003·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Subsyndromal emotional symptoms are common in older adults and are associated with increased disability, health care utilization, and risk for developing psychiatric disorders. The purpose of this study was to examine subsyndromal generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in older adults. Participants included 30 older adults with diagnosable GAD, 19 with subsyndromal anxiety symptoms [minor GAD; (MGAD)], and 21 normal control volunteers (NC). Participants were assessed using the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV and completed self-report measures of anxiety, worry, depression, and life satisfaction. Excessive worry on more days than not, difficulty controlling worry, and clinically significant distress or impairment were the diagnostic criteria endorsed by MGAD participants least often. Therefore, these criteria may be useful in distinguishing between GAD and subsyndromal GAD. Self-reported anxiety and worry also systematically differed across groups in the expected directions, with a discriminant analysis yielding good classification of the GAD and NC groups based on these measures. Categorization of MGAD participants generally was poor, with most misclassified as GAD patients. Clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00130-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 8 · Cited by 48

Authors
Diefenbach, G. J., Hopko, D. R., Feigon, S., Stanley, M. A., Novy, D. M., Beck, J. G., & Averill, P. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Diefenbach, Gretchen J.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
481-487
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041192812
Cited by
48
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH53932, R01MH053932)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
older adults, excessive worry, diagnostic criteria, anxiety symptoms, depression, life satisfaction, discriminant analysis
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Middle Aged, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review