Neuroticism and self-criticism associated with posttraumatic stress disorder in a nationally representative sample
Abstract
Broad and specific psychological traits may uniquely differentiate trauma victims with PTSD from trauma victims without PTSD, but there is a need for representative, population-based research. We investigated elevated neuroticism and self-criticism in association with the presence versus absence of PTSD in a nationally representative sample of adults who experienced a traumatic stressor. Respondents were from the National Comorbidity Survey Part II (N=5877) (). Individuals who experienced one or more traumatic events were selected (N=3238). In separate regression analyses, elevated levels of neuroticism and self-criticism were each significantly associated with PTSD among men and women who had experienced one or more traumatic events. After controlling for types of traumas experienced and other previously identified factors (Bromet, Sonnega, & Kessler, 1998. American Journal of Epidemiology, 147, 353-361), neuroticism remained significantly associated with PTSD in women and both neuroticism and self-criticism remained significant in men. Evidence from this nationally representative sample of adults who experienced traumatic events suggests that self-criticism and especially the broad personality domain of neuroticism may represent robust psychological dimensions associated with the presence of PTSD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Self-criticism and low self-compassion contribute to the development of psychological disorders after stressful life events such as trauma.
“self-criticism and low self-compassion play a role in the development of psychological disorders in response to stressful life events, such as exposure to trauma”
From Using acceptance and commitment therapy to increase self-compassion: A randomized controlled trial (2014) · cites this paper as Cox, MacPherson, Enns, & McWilliams, 2004
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 179
- Authors
- Cox, B. J., MacPherson, P. S. R., Enns, M. W., & McWilliams, L. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Cox, Brian J
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-114
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976616842
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 6.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canada Research Chairs
- National Institutes of Health
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- National Institute of Mental Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, neuroticism, self-criticism, personality traits, traumatic stressors, sex differences, trauma patients
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Neurotic Disorders, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review