The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Panax ginseng pharmacology: A nitric oxide link?
Open accessAbstract
Panax ginseng is used in traditional Chinese medicine to enhance stamina and capacity to cope with fatigue and physical stress. Major active components are the ginsenosides, which are mainly triterpenoid dammarane derivatives. The mechanisms of ginseng actions remain unclear, although there is an extensive literature that deals with effects on the CNS (memory, learning, and behavior), neuroendocrine function, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, immune function, and the cardiovascular system. Reports are often contradictory, perhaps because the ginsenoside content of ginseng root or root extracts can differ, depending on the method of extraction, subsequent treatment, or even the season of its collection. Therefore, use of standardized, authentic ginseng root both in research and by the public is to be advocated. Several recent studies have suggested that the antioxidant and organ-protective actions of ginseng are linked to enhanced nitric oxide (NO) synthesis in endothelium of lung, heart, and kidney and in the corpus cavernosum. Enhanced NO synthesis thus could contribute to ginseng-associated vasodilatation and perhaps also to an aphrodisiac action of the root. Ginseng is sold in the U.S. as a food additive and thus need not meet specific safety and efficacy requirements of the Food and Drug Administration. Currently, such sales amount to over $300 million annually. As public use of ginseng continues to grow, it is important for this industry and Federal regulatory authorities to encourage efforts to study the efficacy of ginseng in humans by means of appropriately designed double-blind clinical studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unconventional medicine in the United States-Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use
Eisenberg, D. M., Kessler, R. C., Foster, C., Norlock, F. E., Calkins, D. R., & Delbanco, T. L. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199301283280406 · Cited by 4,177
Rajfer, J., Aronson, W. J., Bush, P. A., Dorey, F. J., & Ignarro, L. J. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199201093260203 · Cited by 1,006
Prevalence and cost of alternative medicine in Australia
MacLennan, A. H., Wilson, D. H., & Taylor, A. W. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91271-4 · Cited by 946
New Substances of Plant Origin Which Increase Nonspecific Resistance
Brekhman, I. I., & Dardymov, I. V. (1969) · Annual Review of Pharmacology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pa.09.040169.002223 · Cited by 595
Cited by
Kim, J. H., Yi, Y.-S., Kim, M.-Y., & Cho, J. Y. (2017) · Journal of Ginseng Research · doi:10.1016/j.jgr.2016.08.004 · Cited by 574
Christensen (2008) · doi:10.1016/s1043-4526(08)00401-4 · Cited by 504
Youdim, K. A., & Joseph, J. A. (2001) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0891-5849(00)00510-4 · Cited by 435
Plants and the central nervous system
Carlini, E. A. (2003) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(03)00112-6 · Cited by 355
Winslow, L. C., & Kroll, D. J. (1998) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.158.20.2192 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Gillis, C. N.
- Venue
- Biochemical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0006-2952 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155612395
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Panax ginseng pharmacology: A nitric oxide link? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00193-7
- The paper
- Gillis, C. N. (1997). Panax ginseng pharmacology: A nitric oxide link? Biochemical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00193-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.