Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The practical value of modelling relative abundance of species for regional conservation planning: a case study

Pearce, Jennie, Ferrier, Simon·2001·Biological Conservation
DOI 10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00139-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00139-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Austin, 1983, Altitudinal distribution of several Eucalyptus species in relation to other environmental factors in southern New South Wales, Australian Journal of Ecology, 8, 169, 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1983.tb01604.x · DOI
  2. Bart, 1989, Use of presence-absence to measure changes in avian density, Journal of Wildlife Management, 53, 847, 10.2307/3809224 · doi:10.2307/3809224
  3. Borchers, 1998, Improving the precision of the daily egg production method using generalised additive models, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 54, 2727, 10.1139/f97-134 · doi:10.1139/f97-134
  4. Derksen, 1992, Backward, forward and stepwise automated subset selection algorithms, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 265, 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1992.tb00992.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Feber, 1996, The effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fields, Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 1191, 10.2307/2404698 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gaston, 1990, Effects of scale and habitat on the relationship between regional distribution and local abundance, Oikos, 58, 329, 10.2307/3545224 · doi:10.2307/3545224
  7. Heilbron, D.C., 1994. Zero-altered and other regression models for count data with added zeros. Biometrical Journal 36, 531–547. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Henke, 1998, The effect of multiple search items and item abundance on the efficiency of human searchers, Journal of Herpetology, 82, 112, 10.2307/1565489 · doi:10.2307/1565489
  9. Hobbs, 1990, Habitat evaluation, Journal of Wildlife Management, 54, 515, 10.2307/3809344 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Lavers, 1996, Using models of bird abundance to predict the impact of current land-use and conservation policies in the Flow Country of Caithness and Sutherland, Northern Scotland, Biological Conservation, 75, 71, 10.1016/0006-3207(95)00035-6 · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(95)00035-6
  11. Lawton, 1993, Range, population abundance and conservation, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 409, 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90043-O · DOI · Paper page
  12. Leathwick, 1998, Are New Zealand's Nothofagus species in equilibrium with their environment?, Journal of Vegetation Science, 9, 719, 10.2307/3237290 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Lindenmayer, 1991, The conservation of arboreal marsupials in the montane ash forests of the central highlands of Victoria, South-east Australia, Biological Conservation, 56, 295, 10.1016/0006-3207(91)90063-F · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(91)90063-f
  14. Link, 1998, Estimating population change from count data, Ecological Applications, 8, 258, 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0258:EPCFCD]2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0258:epcfcd]2.0.co;2
  15. Pearce, 2000, An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species distribution models using logistic regression, Ecological Modelling, 128, 127, 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00227-6 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Stockwell, 1990, Using induction of decision trees to predict Greater Glider density, AI Applications, 4, 33
  17. Van Horne, 1983, Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality, Journal of Wildlife Management, 47, 893, 10.2307/3808148 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Venier, 1996, Habitat availability causes the species abundance–distribution relationship, Oikos, 7, 564, 10.2307/3546349 · DOI
  19. Venier, 1998, Intra-specific abundance–distribution relationships, Oikos, 82, 483, 10.2307/3546369 · DOI
  20. Walsh, 1996, Factors determining the abundance of Vespertilionid bats in Britain, Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 519, 10.2307/2404981 · DOI
  21. Welsh, 1996, Modelling the abundance of rare species, Ecological Modelling, 88, 297, 10.1016/0304-3800(95)00113-1 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Pearce, J., & Ferrier, S.
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-03
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
33-43
ISSN
0006-3207
DOI
10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00139-7
Cited by
165
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The practical value of modelling relative abundance of species for regional conservation planning: a case study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00139-7
The paper
Pearce, J., & Ferrier, S. (2001). The practical value of modelling relative abundance of species for regional conservation planning: a case study. Biological Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00139-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.