The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effects on Butterfly Abundance of the Management of Uncropped Edges of Arable Fields
Abstract
1. The abundance and species richness of butterflies on expanded-width uncropped arable field edges, which were subject to 10 contrasting, experimental management regimes, were measured using transects in 1989, 1990 and 1991. The effects of the management regimes on a number of botanical variables, likely to be of importance to butterflies, were measured. 2. On the experimental field edges, butterfly abundance and species richness fluctuated between years and peaked at different times each year. 3. Butterfly abundance and species richness differed between experimental treatments. Plots which were either cut in the spring and autumn, or not cut at all, attracted more individuals and species of butterfly than did plots cut in the summer. Sowing with a grass and wild flower seed mixture increased butterfly abundance. Butterfly abundance declined on swards sprayed once annually with herbicide. 4. Mowing, sowing and spraying had significant effects on mean flower abundance, on the annual and perennial components flowering in the sward, and on the abundance of commonly used nectar sources and larval host-plants. 5. Stepwise multiple regression analyses on butterfly and plant data showed that the abundance of adults of most butterfly species was most closely associated with the abundance of flowers of key nectar source species. 6. The results are discussed in relation to resource provision for larval and adult butterfly stages. Recommendations (emboldened in the text) are made for the conservation management of butterflies on arable farmland.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Semi-natural grasslands as population sources for pollinating insects in agricultural landscapes
ÖCKINGER, E., & SMITH, H. G. (2007) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01250.x · Cited by 518
Self-citationCARVELL, C., MEEK, W. R., PYWELL, R. F., GOULSON, D., & NOWAKOWSKI, M. (2007) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01249.x · Cited by 444
The decline of moths in Great Britain: a review of possible causes
FOX, R. (2013) · Insect Conservation and Diversity · doi:10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00186.x · Cited by 302
Local and landscape effects of organic farming on butterfly species richness and abundance
Rundlöf, M., Bengtsson, J., & Smith, H. G. (2008) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01448.x · Cited by 209
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Feber, R. E., Smith, H., & MacDonald, D. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1191
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078686117
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects on Butterfly Abundance of the Management of Uncropped Edges of Arable Fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2404698
- The paper
- Feber, R. E., Smith, H., & MacDonald, D. W. (1996). The Effects on Butterfly Abundance of the Management of Uncropped Edges of Arable Fields. The Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404698
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.