The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife–habitat models
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals
White, G. C., & Burnham, K. P. (1999) · Bird Study · doi:10.1080/00063659909477239 · Cited by 7,499
Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems
Besag, J. (1974) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00999.x · Cited by 6,067
Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation
Pulliam, H. R. (1988) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284880 · Cited by 5,367
ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE
MacKenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Lachman, G. B., Droege, S., Andrew Royle, J., & Langtimm, C. A. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2248:esorwd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,481
Hanski, I. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23876 · Cited by 2,779
Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations
Otis, D. L., Burnham, K. P., White, G. C., & Anderson, D. R. (1978) · Wildlife Monographs · Cited by 2,442
Collett, D. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-4475-7 · Cited by 1,936
A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics
Hanski, I. (1994) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5591 · Cited by 1,640
ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM REPEATED PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA OR POINT COUNTS
Royle, J. A., & Nichols, J. D. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0777:eafrpa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,364
Predicting species occurrences : issues of accuracy and scale
Scott, J. M. (2002) · Cited by 806
Cited by
Selecting pseudo‐absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many?
Barbet‐Massin, M., Jiguet, F., Albert, C. H., & Thuiller, W. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00172.x · Cited by 2,716
The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling
Lobo, J. M., Jiménez‐Valverde, A., & Hortal, J. (2010) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06039.x · Cited by 656
WHAT ARE THE ISSUES WITH PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA FOR WILDLIFE MANAGERS?
MacKENZIE, D. I. (2005) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0849:watiwp]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 429
Guillera‐Arroita, G. (2017) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.02445 · Cited by 426
GENERALIZED SITE OCCUPANCY MODELS ALLOWING FOR FALSE POSITIVE AND FALSE NEGATIVE ERRORS
Royle, J. A., & Link, W. A. (2006) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[835:gsomaf]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Gu, W., & Swihart, R. K.
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-203
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100323608
- Cited by
- 788
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 14.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife–habitat models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00190-3
- The paper
- Gu, W., & Swihart, R. K. (2004). Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife–habitat models. Biological Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00190-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
