The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals
Open accessAbstract
MARK provides parameter estimates from marked animals when they are re-encountered at a later time as dead recoveries, or live recaptures or re-sightings. The time intervals between re-encounters do not have to be equal. More than one attribute group of animals can be modelled. The basic input to MARK is the encounter history for each animal. MARK can also estimate the size of closed populations. Parameters can be constrained to be the same across re-encounter occasions, or by age, or group, using the parameter index matrix. A set of common models for initial screening of data are provided. Time effects, group effects, time x group effects and a null model of none of the above, are provided for each parameter. Besides the logit function to link the design matrix to the parameters of the model, other link functions include the log—log, complimentary log—log, sine, log, and identity. The estimates of model parameters are computed via numerical maximum likelihood techniques. The number of parameters that are estimable in the model are determined numerically and used to compute the quasi-likelihood AIC value for the model. Both the input data, and outputs for various models that the user has built, are stored in the Results database which contains a complete description of the model building process. It is viewed and manipulated in a Results Browser window. Summaries available from this window include viewing and printing model output, deviance residuals from the model, likelihood ratio and analysis of deviance between models, and adjustments for over dispersion. Models can also be retrieved and modified to create additional models. These capabilities are implemented in a Microsoft Windows 95 interface. The online help system has been developed to provide all necessary program documentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Cited by
Model selection in ecology and evolution
Johnson, J. B., & Omland, K. S. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.013 · Cited by 3,838
Uninformative Parameters and Model Selection Using Akaike's Information Criterion
ARNOLD, T. W. (2010) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01236.x · Cited by 3,417
Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife–habitat models
Gu, W., & Swihart, R. K. (2004) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00190-3 · Cited by 788
Fecundity-Survival Trade-Offs and Parental Risk-Taking in Birds
Ghalambor, C. K., & Martin, T. E. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1059379 · Cited by 522
Guillera‐Arroita, G. (2017) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.02445 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- White, G. C., & Burnham, K. P.
- Venue
- Bird Study
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- sup1
- Pages
- S120-S139
- ISSN
- 0006-3657 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-6705
- OpenAlex
- W2133371793
- Cited by
- 7,499
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 110.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00063659909477239
- The paper
- White, G. C., & Burnham, K. P. (1999). Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063659909477239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.