Cited by 63Menstrual Health and DisordersStress Responses and CortisolCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Cortisol circadian rhythms during the menstrual cycle and with sleep deprivation in premenstrual dysphoric disorder and normal control subjects

Parry, Barbara L, Javeed, Suryabanu, Laughlin, Gail A, Hauger, Richard, Clopton, Paul·2000·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background In this study we extended previous work by examining whether disturbances in the circadian rhythms of cortisol during the menstrual cycle distinguish patients with premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) from normal control (NC) subjects. In addition, we tested the differential response to the effects of early and late partial sleep deprivation on cortisol rhythms.Methods In 15 PMDD and 15 NC subjects we measured cortisol levels every 30 min from 6:00 PM to 9:00 AM during midfollicular (MF) and late luteal (LL) menstrual cycle phases and also during a randomized crossover trial of early (sleep 3:00 AM-7:00 AM) versus late (sleep 9:00 PM-1:00 AM) partial sleep deprivation administered in two subsequent and separate luteal phases.Results In follicular versus luteal menstrual cycle phases we observed altered timing but not quantitative measures of cortisol secretion in PMDD subjects, compared with NC subjects: in the LL versus MF phase the cortisol acrophase was a mean of 1 hour earlier in NC subjects, but not in PMDD subjects. The effect of sleep deprivation on cortisol timing measures also differed for PMDD versus NC subjects: during late partial sleep deprivation (when subjects' sleep was earlier), the cortisol acrophase was almost 2 hours earlier in PMDD subjects.Conclusions Timing rather than quantitative measures of cortisol secretion differentiated PMDD subjects from NC subjects both during the menstrual cycle and in response to early versus late sleep deprivation interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00876-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 63

Authors
Parry, B. L., Javeed, S., Laughlin, G. A., Hauger, R., & Clopton, P.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Parry, Barbara L
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-11
Volume
48
Issue
9
Pages
920-931
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991574061
Cited by
63
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH30914)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M-01RR00827, M01RR000827)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
premenstrual dysphoric disorder, cortisol, circadian rhythm, menstrual cycle, luteal phase, follicular phase, sleep deprivation
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Follicular Phase, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Luteal Phase, Menstrual Cycle, Premenstrual Syndrome, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Sleep Deprivation, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review