Early predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder
Abstract
The benefits of providing early intervention for people recently exposed to trauma have highlighted the need to develop means to identify people who will develop chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This review provides an overview of prospective studies that have indexed the acute reactions to trauma that are predictive of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder. Ten studies of the predictive power of the acute stress disorder diagnosis indicate that this diagnosis does not have adequate predictive power. There is no convergence across studies on any constellation of acute symptoms that predict posttraumatic stress disorder. A review of biological and cognitive mechanisms occurring in the acute posttraumatic phase suggests that these factors may provide more accurate means of predicting chronic posttraumatic stress disorder. Recommendations for future research to facilitate identification of key markers of acutely traumatized people who will develop posttraumatic stress disorder are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Acute stress disorder has poor specificity for predicting PTSD.
“it does not exhibit good specificity for predicting PTSD (see Bryant, 2003; Harvey & Bryant, 1998; 1999; Zoellner, Jaycox, Watlington, Foa, 2003).”
From Dissociation and memory fragmentation in post-traumatic stress disorder: An evaluation of the dissociative encoding hypothesis (2012) · cites this paper as Bryant, 2003
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 78 · Cited by 275
- Authors
- Bryant, R. A.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Bryant, Richard A
- ORCID
- Bryant, Richard A
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 789-795
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045986961
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, acute stress disorder, early predictors, chronic PTSD, trauma exposure, risk factors, biological mechanisms, cognitive mechanisms, early intervention, prospective study
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review