The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lipid Intermediates in Membrane Fusion: Formation, Structure, and Decay of Hemifusion Diaphragm
Open accessAbstract
Lipid bilayer fusion is thought to involve formation of a local hemifusion connection, referred to as a fusion stalk. The subsequent fusion stages leading to the opening of a fusion pore remain unknown. The earliest fusion pore could represent a bilayer connection between the membranes and could be formed directly from the stalk. Alternatively, fusion pore can form in a single bilayer, referred to as hemifusion diaphragm (HD), generated by stalk expansion. To analyze the plausibility of stalk expansion, we studied the pathway of hemifusion theoretically, using a recently developed elastic model. We show that the stalk has a tendency to expand into an HD for lipids with sufficiently negative spontaneous splay, (~)J(s)< 0. For different experimentally relevant membrane configurations we find two characteristic values of the spontaneous splay. (~)J*(s) and (~)J**(s), determining HD dimension. The HD is predicted to have a finite equilibrium radius provided that the spontaneous splay is in the range (~)J**(s)< (~)J(s)<(~)J*(s), and to expand infinitely for (~)J(s)<(~)J**(s). In the case of common lipids, which do not fuse spontaneously, an HD forms only under action of an external force pulling the diaphragm rim apart. We calculate the dependence of the HD radius on this force. To address the mechanism of fusion pore formation, we analyze the distribution of the lateral tension emerging in the HD due to the establishment of lateral equilibrium between the deformed and relaxed portions of lipid monolayers. We show that this tension concentrates along the HD rim and reaches high values sufficient to rupture the bilayer and form the fusion pore. Our analysis supports the hypothesis that transition from a hemifusion to a fusion pore involves radial expansion of the stalk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydration forces between phospholipid bilayers
Rand, R. P., & Parsegian, V. A. (1989) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/0304-4157(89)90010-5 · Cited by 1,125
Chanturiya, A., Chernomordik, L. V., & Zimmerberg, J. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.26.14423 · Cited by 201
Self-citation
Cited by
Chernomordik, L. V., & Kozlov, M. M. (2008) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1455 · Cited by 1,037
Self-citationBiological and synthetic membranes: What can be learned from a coarse-grained description?
MULLER, M., KATSOV, K., & SCHICK, M. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.08.003 · Cited by 320
Smirnova, Y. G., Risselada, H. J., & Müller, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1818200116 · Cited by 81
High curvature promotes fusion of lipid membranes: Predictions from continuum elastic theory
Golani, G., & Schwarz, U. S. (2023) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2023.04.018 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Kozlovsky, Y., Chernomordik, L. V., & Kozlov, M. M.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2634-2651
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005152944
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lipid Intermediates in Membrane Fusion: Formation, Structure, and Decay of Hemifusion Diaphragm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75274-0
- The paper
- Kozlovsky, Y., Chernomordik, L. V., & Kozlov, M. M. (2002). Lipid Intermediates in Membrane Fusion: Formation, Structure, and Decay of Hemifusion Diaphragm. Biophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75274-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.