The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Really Prevents Proton Transport through Aquaporin? Charge Self-Energy versus Proton Wire Proposals
Open accessAbstract
The nature of the control of water/proton selectivity in biological channels is a problem of a fundamental importance. Most studies of this issue have proposed that an interference with the orientational requirements of the so-called proton wire is the source of selectivity. The elucidation of the structures of aquaporins, which have evolved to prevent proton transfer (PT), provided a clear benchmark for exploring the selectivity problem. Previous simulations of this system have not examined, however, the actual issue of PT, but only considered the much simpler task of the transfer of water molecules. Here we take aquaporin as a benchmark and quantify the origin of the water/proton selectivity in this and related systems. This is done by evaluating in a consistent way the free energy profile for transferring a proton along the channel and relating this profile to the relevant PT rate constants. It is found that the water/proton selectivity is controlled by the change in solvation free energy upon moving the charged proton from water to the channel. The reason for the focus on the elegant concept of the proton wire and the related Grotthuss-type mechanism is also considered. It is concluded that these mechanisms are clearly important in cases with flat free energy surfaces (e.g., in bulk water, in gas phase water chains, and in infinitely long channels). However, in cases of biological channels, the actual PT mechanism is much less important than the energetics of transferring the proton charge from water to different regions in the channels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climatic Impact of Tropical Lowland Deforestation on Nearby Montane Cloud Forests
Lawton, R. O., Nair, U. S., Pielke, R. A., & Welch, R. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062459 · Cited by 1,169
Structural basis of water-specific transport through the AQP1 water channel
Sui, H., Han, B.-G., Lee, J. K., Walian, P., & Jap, B. K. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/414872a · Cited by 1,166
PARSEGIAN, A. (1969) · Nature · doi:10.1038/221844a0 · Cited by 854
Cited by
Water as an active constituent in cell biology
Ball, P. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068037a · Cited by 2,177
Aquaporins: important but elusive drug targets
Verkman, A. S., Anderson, M. O., & Papadopoulos, M. C. (2014) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4226 · Cited by 586
Polarizable Force Fields: History, Test Cases, and Prospects
Warshel, A., Kato, M., & Pisliakov, A. V. (2007) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct700127w · Cited by 377
Self-citationKamerlin, S. C. L., Haranczyk, M., & Warshel, A. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp8071712 · Cited by 281
Self-citationComputational studies of membrane channels
Roux, B., & Schulten, K. (2004) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2004.06.013 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Burykin, A., & Warshel, A.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3696-3706
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045179269
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Really Prevents Proton Transport through Aquaporin? Charge Self-Energy versus Proton Wire Proposals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0006-3495(03)74786-9
- The paper
- Burykin, A., & Warshel, A. (2003). What Really Prevents Proton Transport through Aquaporin? Charge Self-Energy versus Proton Wire Proposals. Biophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(03)74786-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.