The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Computational functions in biochemical reaction networks
Open accessAbstract
In prior work we demonstrated the implementation of logic gates, sequential computers (universal Turing machines), and parallel computers by means of the kinetics of chemical reaction mechanisms. In the present article we develop this subject further by first investigating the computational properties of several enzymatic (single and multiple) reaction mechanisms: we show their steady states are analogous to either Boolean or fuzzy logic gates. Nearly perfect digital function is obtained only in the regime in which the enzymes are saturated with their substrates. With these enzymatic gates, we construct combinational chemical networks that execute a given truth-table. The dynamic range of a network's output is strongly affected by "input/output matching" conditions among the internal gate elements. We find a simple mechanism, similar to the interconversion of fructose-6-phosphate between its two bisphosphate forms (fructose-1,6-bisphosphate and fructose-2,6-bisphosphate), that functions analogously to an AND gate. When the simple model is supplanted with one in which the enzyme rate laws are derived from experimental data, the steady state of the mechanism functions as an asymmetric fuzzy aggregation operator with properties akin to a fuzzy AND gate. The qualitative behavior of the mechanism does not change when situated within a large model of glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and the TCA cycle. The mechanism, in this case, switches the pathway's mode from glycolysis to gluconeogenesis in response to chemical signals of low blood glucose (cAMP) and abundant fuel for the TCA cycle (acetyl coenzyme A).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli
Gardner, T. S., Cantor, C. R., & Collins, J. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002131 · Cited by 4,268
Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif
Mangan, S., & Alon, U. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2133841100 · Cited by 1,827
DNA as a universal substrate for chemical kinetics
Soloveichik, D., Seelig, G., & Winfree, E. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0909380107 · Cited by 693
Circuit Simulation of Genetic Networks
McAdams, H. H., & Shapiro, L. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7624793 · Cited by 517
Artificial Chemistries—A Review
Dittrich, P., Ziegler, J., & Banzhaf, W. (2001) · Artificial Life · doi:10.1162/106454601753238636 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Arkin, A., & Ross, J.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 560-578
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029108612
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational functions in biochemical reaction networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0006-3495(94)80516-8
- The paper
- Arkin, A., & Ross, J. (1994). Computational functions in biochemical reaction networks. Biophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(94)80516-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.