The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hindered diffusion in agarose gels: test of effective medium model
Open accessAbstract
The diffusivities of uncharged macromolecules in gels (D) are typically lower than in free solution (D infinity), because of a combination of hydrodynamic and steric factors. To examine these factors, we measured D and D infinity for dilute solutions of several fluorescein-labeled macromolecules, using an image-based fluorescence recovery after photobleaching technique. Test macromolecules with Stokes-Einstein radii (rs) of 2.1-6.2 nm, including three globular proteins (bovine serum albumin, ovalbumin, lactalbumin) and four narrow fractions of Ficoll, were studied in agarose gels with agarose volume fractions (phi) of 0.038-0.073. The gels were characterized by measuring the hydraulic permeability of supported agarose membranes, allowing calculation of the Darcy permeability (kappa) for each gel sample. It was found that kappa, which is a measure of the intrinsic hydraulic conductance of the gel, decreased by an order of magnitude as phi was increased over the range indicated. The diffusivity ratio D/D infinity, which varied from 0.20 to 0.63, decreased with increases in rs or phi. Thus as expected, diffusional hindrances were the most severe for large macromolecules and/or relatively concentrated gels. According to a recently proposed theory for hindered diffusion through fibrous media, the diffusivity ratio is given by the product of a hydrodynamic factor (F) and a steric factor (S). The functional form is D/D infinity = F(rs/k1/2) S(f), where f = [(rs+rf)/rf]2 phi and rf is the fiber radius. Values of D/D infinity calculated from this effective medium theory, without use of adjustable parameters, were in much better agreement with the measured values than were predictions based on other approaches. The strengths and limitations of the effective medium theory for predicting diffusivities in gels are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diffusion in Brain Extracellular Space
Syková, E., & Nicholson, C. (2008) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00027.2007 · Cited by 1,481
Solid stress inhibits the growth of multicellular tumor spheroids
Helmlinger, G., Netti, P. A., Lichtenbeld, H. C., Melder, R. J., & Jain, R. K. (1997) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0897-778 · Cited by 859
Self-citationDiffusion of Macromolecules in Agarose Gels: Comparison of Linear and Globular Configurations
Pluen, A., Netti, P. A., Jain, R. K., & Berk, D. A. (1999) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(99)76911-0 · Cited by 573
Self-citationGels with sense: supramolecular materials that respond to heat, light and sound
Jones, C. D., & Steed, J. W. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00435k · Cited by 487
Venturoli, D., & Rippe, B. (2005) · American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00171.2004 · Cited by 461
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, E. M., Berk, D. A., Jain, R. K., & Deen, W. M.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1017-1023
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037477418
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hindered diffusion in agarose gels: test of effective medium model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79645-5
- The paper
- Johnson, E. M., Berk, D. A., Jain, R. K., & Deen, W. M. (1996). Hindered diffusion in agarose gels: test of effective medium model. Biophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79645-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.