Cited by 87Neurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesThermal Regulation in Medicine

Brain damage in a mouse model of global cerebral ischemia

Olsson, Tomas, Wieloch, Tadeusz, Smith, Maj-Lis·2003·Brain Research

Abstract

The importance of particular genes in neuronal death following global cerebral ischemia can readily be studied in genetically modified mice provided a reliable model of ischemia is available. For that purpose, we developed a mouse model of global cerebral ischemia that induces consistent damage to different regions of the brain and with a low mortality rate. Twelve minutes of ischemia was induced in C57BL/6 mice by bilateral common carotid artery occlusion under halothane anesthesia and artificial ventilation. Body and brain temperature were monitored and cortical cerebral blood flow in each hemisphere was measured by laser Doppler flowmeter before, during, and for 5 min after ischemia. Extensive damage was found in the striatum and marked cell damage was observed in the CA1 and CA2 regions of hippocampus and in thalamus. Mild damage was seen in the CA3 region, dentate gyrus and cortex. Hippocampal damage in the CA1 region is delayed and developed over 48 h. Intraischemic hypothermia of 33 degrees C provided a robust neuroprotection. The non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor blocker, MK-801, did not provide protection in the hippocampus, cortex, striatum or thalamus when administered 30 min prior to ischemia or 2 h after the end of ischemia, but selectively mitigated damage in the hippocampus, when administered immediately following ischemia. This model of global cerebral ischemia may be useful in pharmacological and genomic studies of ischemic brain damage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-8993(03)03014-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olsson, T., Wieloch, T., & Smith, M.-L.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Olsson, Tomas
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
982
Issue
2
Pages
260-269
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1682882940
Cited by
87
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Thermal Regulation in Medicine
Keywords
global cerebral ischemia, mouse model, carotid artery occlusion, striatal damage, cortical blood flow, neuroprotection, MK-801, NMDA receptor, neuronal cell death
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Ischemia, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Disease Models, Animal, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review