Cited by 246Neurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

C57BL/6 strain is most susceptible to cerebral ischemia following bilateral common carotid occlusion among seven mouse strains: selective neuronal death in the murine transient forebrain ischemia

Yang, Gongming, Kitagawa, Kazuo, Matsushita, Kohji, Mabuchi, Takuma, Yagita, Yoshiki, Yanagihara, Takehiko, Matsumoto, Masayasu·1997·Brain Research

Abstract

Rats and gerbils have been used widely to investigate the molecular mechanism of selective neuronal death following transient global ischemia. Recently, the availability of transgenic mice has enabled us to examine the involvement of specific gene products in various pathophysiological conditions. However, there has been only limited information about the experimental model of cerebral ischemia in mice, particularly in regard to selective neuronal death. We examined whether bilateral carotid occlusion produced global forebrain ischemia in seven common mouse strains including C57BL/6, ICR, BALB/c, C3H, CBA, ddY and DBA/2, based on neurological signs, histological findings and cortical microcirculatory as well as India ink perfusion patterns. The C57BL/6 strain was found to be the most susceptible among seven strains. All C57BL/6 mice died within 6 h after permanent bilateral carotid occlusion. After transient bilateral carotid occlusion for 20 min, more than 90% of C57BL/6 mice showed typical neurological signs such as torsion of the neck and rolling fits, and developed selective neuronal death in the hippocampus and caudoputamen. Hypothermia prevented the neuronal death. Visualization of brain vasculature by India ink perfusion indicated that the susceptibility of the mice after bilateral carotid occlusion depended mainly on the degree of anastomosis between carotid and basilar arteries. Our results showed the feasibility of investigating selective neuronal death in transgeni…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-8993(96)01453-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, G., Kitagawa, K., Matsushita, K., Mabuchi, T., Yagita, Y., Yanagihara, T., & Matsumoto, M.
Affiliations
  • Osaka University Hospital (JP)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
Corresponding author
Kitagawa, Kazuo
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-03
Volume
752
Issue
1-2
Pages
209-218
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998005675
Cited by
246
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 14
FWCI
8.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
cerebral ischemia, selective neuronal death, transient global cerebral ischemia, mouse strain susceptibility, C57BL/6 mice, hippocampal neuronal death, caudoputamen, carotid-basilar anastomosis, cortical microcirculation, inbred mouse strains
MeSH terms
Animals, Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Brain Ischemia, Ischemic Attack, Transient, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Collateral Circulation, Disease Susceptibility, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred Strains, Nervous System, Neurons, Prosencephalon, Cell Death, Carotid Artery, Common, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review