Cited by 248Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurological disorders and treatments

Efferent projections of the nucleus accumbens in the rat with special reference to subdivision of the nucleus: biotinylated dextran amine study

Usuda, Iwao, Tanaka, Koichi, Chiba, Tanemichi·1998·Brain Research

Abstract

The nucleus accumbens (Acb) of the rat has been divided immunohistochemically into shell and core, and further, it was subdivided into several portions in relation to functional significance. In this report, the efferent projection of each subdivision of the Acb was examined using biotinylated dextran amine as an anterograde tracer. In rostral Acb, the dorsomedial shell mainly projected to the dorsomedial ventral pallidum (VP), lateral hypothalamus (LH) and substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), while the ventromedial shell projected to the ventromedial VP, lateral preoptic area, LH and ventral tegmental area (VTA). The dorsal core of rostral Acb projected to the caudate putamen, dorsolateral VP, globus pallidus (GP), LH, and substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr). In the middle to caudal Acb, the dorsomedial shell mainly projected to the dorsomedial VP, LH and VTA, the ventromedial shell projected to the ventromedial VP, substantia innominata, VTA, SNc and retrorubral area, and the ventrolateral shell projected to the ventrolateral VP and SNc. Furthermore, the ventromedial shell projected to the parabrachial nucleus (PB). The dorsomedial core projected to the dorsal VP, LH, SNc and SNr, and the ventral and lateral core sent axons to the dorsolateral VP, GP and SNc. From the point of view of projection patterns, shell and core are distinct throughout the rostro-caudal extent of the Acb. The ventrolateral shell at the caudal Acb was clearly differentiated. A direct projection from the ventromedial shell of the Acb to PB was also recognised.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)00359-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 87 · Cited by 248

Authors
Usuda, I., Tanaka, K., & Chiba, T.
Affiliations
Chiba University (JP)
Corresponding author
Chiba, Tanemichi
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-06
Volume
797
Issue
1
Pages
73-93
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006193711
Cited by
248
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
nucleus accumbens, efferent projections, ventral pallidum, substantia nigra pars compacta, substantia nigra pars reticulata, ventral tegmental area, lateral hypothalamus, parabrachial nucleus, caudate-putamen, globus pallidus, substantia innominata, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Autonomic Nervous System, Biotin, Cell Nucleus, Corpus Striatum, Dextrans, Diencephalon, Fluorescent Dyes, Male, Mesencephalon, Neurons, Efferent, Nucleus Accumbens, Pons, Prosencephalon, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review